SEO

In sco (3.2v4.2) unix I have:
/etc/hosts

# @(#)hosts 1.2 Lachman System V STREAMS TCP source
# SCCS IDENTIFICATION
127.0.0.1 localhost
223.252.254.1 scosysv scosysv.default.com
223.252.254.118 pc019 pc019.default.com
223.252.254.109 pc010 Jura PC-NFS24A04767
223.252.254.1 host1 host1.default.com
223.252.254.201 host0 host0.default.com
223.252.254.218 doc doc.default.com

Now I want to add new addresses, so append

192.160.2.76 my my.default.com


close the host file... and what next?

How to -hm- "(re)compile", rebuild, setup, configure... you know what
I'm trying to say.

(tried with mkhost, but w/o success, when I want to approuch to the
unix server from another computer (win xp) where I put the new
(192.160.2.76) addrress under properties at Local Network, then start
telnet...nada, zilch, zero, nothing).


So, can someone tell me step-by-step how to cofigure, add new
addresses or point me where to find GOOD enough description?

Thanx.

In article <atorq09jgbq03m1beiu7a8fk7ov0ejfjvn@4ax.com>,
El Krbaccha <krba@HotPOP.com> wrote:
>In sco (3.2v4.2) unix I have:
>/etc/hosts

># @(#)hosts 1.2 Lachman System V STREAMS TCP source
># SCCS IDENTIFICATION
>127.0.0.1 localhost
>223.252.254.1 scosysv scosysv.default.com
>223.252.254.118 pc019 pc019.default.com
>223.252.254.109 pc010 Jura PC-NFS24A04767
>223.252.254.1 host1 host1.default.com
>223.252.254.201 host0 host0.default.com
>223.252.254.218 doc doc.default.com

>Now I want to add new addresses, so append

>192.160.2.76 my my.default.com

>close the host file... and what next?

That should be it. What problems are you having.

What has always struck me as odd is that SCO default
to IP alias fully-qualified-name, while the man page
say it is to be IP FQDN alias - as the rest of the world does.

>How to -hm- "(re)compile", rebuild, setup, configure... you know what
>I'm trying to say.

You don't have to.

>(tried with mkhost, but w/o success, when I want to approuch to the
>unix server from another computer (win xp) where I put the new
>(192.160.2.76) addrress under properties at Local Network, then start
>telnet...nada, zilch, zero, nothing).

>So, can someone tell me step-by-step how to cofigure, add new
>addresses or point me where to find GOOD enough description?

Just what problems are you having. If you are trying to resolve
the /etc/hosts from another machine that's not going to work.

You could set up DNS on your SCO machine.

Having the far machines address in the /etc/hosts file on
the SCO system will help with telnet, ssh, etc., as you
won't experience long delays.

You DO have to have /etc/resolv.conf on the SCO machine
setup with resorder local bind in order for the SCO
machine to use the /etc/hosts file first.

Bill

--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com

On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 17:15:00 GMT, bv@wjv.com (Bill Vermillion) wrote:

>In article <atorq09jgbq03m1beiu7a8fk7ov0ejfjvn@4ax.com>,
>El Krbaccha <krba@HotPOP.com> wrote:
>>In sco (3.2v4.2) unix I have:
>>/etc/hosts
>
>># @(#)hosts 1.2 Lachman System V STREAMS TCP source
>># SCCS IDENTIFICATION
>>127.0.0.1 localhost
>>223.252.254.1 scosysv scosysv.default.com
>>223.252.254.118 pc019 pc019.default.com
>>223.252.254.109 pc010 Jura PC-NFS24A04767
>>223.252.254.1 host1 host1.default.com
>>223.252.254.201 host0 host0.default.com
>>223.252.254.218 doc doc.default.com
>
>>Now I want to add new addresses, so append
>
>>192.160.2.76 my my.default.com
>
>>close the host file... and what next?
>
>That should be it. What problems are you having.

Obviously, there is some problem, isn't it?
(or I'm just bore...and want to write something (killing English and
myself with it))

>What has always struck me as odd is that SCO default
>to IP alias fully-qualified-name, while the man page
>say it is to be IP FQDN alias - as the rest of the world does.


Tell me, you saw the beginning of this message
">>In sco (3.2v4.2) unix I have:"?

>>How to -hm- "(re)compile", rebuild, setup, configure... you know what
>>I'm trying to say.
>
>You don't have to.

I think that I have to.
Because if I put on 98, Me, Xp, 2K... in Local Network -> Properties
....-> TCP/IP .... IP address which is on Unix (etc/host (and somwhere
else?!)) stuff works.

BUT if I put new one in TCP/IP on xp, and the SAME (Bill) in etc/hosts
from the unix side (story) - stuff DO NOT works.

MENSA conclusion - something missing!

>>(tried with mkhost, but w/o success, when I want to approuch to the
>>unix server from another computer (win xp) where I put the new
>>(192.160.2.76) addrress under properties at Local Network, then start
>>telnet...nada, zilch, zero, nothing).
>
>>So, can someone tell me step-by-step how to cofigure, add new
>>addresses or point me where to find GOOD enough description?
>
>Just what problems are you having. If you are trying to resolve
>the /etc/hosts from another machine that's not going to work.

How come that it works with older address (xp -> unix)

>You could set up DNS on your SCO machine.

HOW?
(">>So, can someone tell me step-by-step how to cofigure")

As I saw, you do not read the whole message anyway. N'est pas?
Here we talking about Open Server SCO unix Release 3.2v4.2.
This is a pretty oldie guy.


(why the older ">>223.252.254.118 pc019 pc019.default.com" address
works?)



>Having the far machines address in the /etc/hosts file on
>the SCO system will help with telnet, ssh, etc., as you
>won't experience long delays.
>
>You DO have to have /etc/resolv.conf on the SCO machine
>setup with resorder local bind in order for the SCO
>machine to use the /etc/hosts file first.

No, I have not anywhere resolv.conf (and with old addresses
works...hm!)

>Bill

Thank you Bill,

(says Uma... )

El Krbaccha typed (on Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 09:49:01PM +0100):
| On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 17:15:00 GMT, bv@wjv.com (Bill Vermillion) wrote:
|
| >In article <atorq09jgbq03m1beiu7a8fk7ov0ejfjvn@4ax.com>,
| >El Krbaccha <krba@HotPOP.com> wrote:
| >>In sco (3.2v4.2) unix I have:
| >>/etc/hosts
| >
| >># @(#)hosts 1.2 Lachman System V STREAMS TCP source
| >># SCCS IDENTIFICATION
| >>127.0.0.1 localhost
| >>223.252.254.1 scosysv scosysv.default.com
| >>223.252.254.118 pc019 pc019.default.com
| >>223.252.254.109 pc010 Jura PC-NFS24A04767
| >>223.252.254.1 host1 host1.default.com
| >>223.252.254.201 host0 host0.default.com
| >>223.252.254.218 doc doc.default.com
| >
| >>Now I want to add new addresses, so append
| >
| >>192.160.2.76 my my.default.com
| >
| >>close the host file... and what next?
| >
| >That should be it. What problems are you having.
|
| Obviously, there is some problem, isn't it?
| (or I'm just bore...and want to write something (killing English and
| myself with it))
|
| >What has always struck me as odd is that SCO default
| >to IP alias fully-qualified-name, while the man page
| >say it is to be IP FQDN alias - as the rest of the world does.
|
|
| Tell me, you saw the beginning of this message
| ">>In sco (3.2v4.2) unix I have:"?
|
| >>How to -hm- "(re)compile", rebuild, setup, configure... you know what
| >>I'm trying to say.
| >
| >You don't have to.
|
| I think that I have to.

NO, you do not.

| Because if I put on 98, Me, Xp, 2K... in Local Network -> Properties
| ...-> TCP/IP .... IP address which is on Unix (etc/host (and somwhere
| else?!)) stuff works.
|
| BUT if I put new one in TCP/IP on xp, and the SAME (Bill) in etc/hosts
| from the unix side (story) - stuff DO NOT works.

Stuff? What stuff? What does not work? Which command did you type and
how did it not work? What error message did you get?

| MENSA conclusion - something missing!
|
| >>(tried with mkhost, but w/o success, when I want to approuch to the
| >>unix server from another computer (win xp) where I put the new
| >>(192.160.2.76) addrress under properties at Local Network, then start
| >>telnet...nada, zilch, zero, nothing).
| >
| >>So, can someone tell me step-by-step how to cofigure, add new
| >>addresses or point me where to find GOOD enough description?
| >
| >Just what problems are you having. If you are trying to resolve
| >the /etc/hosts from another machine that's not going to work.
|
| How come that it works with older address (xp -> unix)
|
| >You could set up DNS on your SCO machine.
|
| HOW?
| (">>So, can someone tell me step-by-step how to cofigure")
|
| As I saw, you do not read the whole message anyway. N'est pas?
| Here we talking about Open Server SCO unix Release 3.2v4.2.
| This is a pretty oldie guy.
|
|
| (why the older ">>223.252.254.118 pc019 pc019.default.com" address
| works?)
|
|
| >Having the far machines address in the /etc/hosts file on
| >the SCO system will help with telnet, ssh, etc., as you
| >won't experience long delays.
| >
| >You DO have to have /etc/resolv.conf on the SCO machine
| >setup with resorder local bind in order for the SCO
| >machine to use the /etc/hosts file first.
|
| No, I have not anywhere resolv.conf (and with old addresses
| works...hm!)
|
| >Bill
|
| Thank you Bill,
|
| (says Uma... )
|

--
JP

In article <ghasq0hd3lrn587u5tgif8367olqlq8oc8@4ax.com>,
El Krbaccha <krba@HotPOP.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 17:15:00 GMT, bv@wjv.com (Bill Vermillion) wrote:

>>In article <atorq09jgbq03m1beiu7a8fk7ov0ejfjvn@4ax.com>,
>>El Krbaccha <krba@HotPOP.com> wrote:
>>>In sco (3.2v4.2) unix I have:
>>>/etc/hosts

>>># @(#)hosts 1.2 Lachman System V STREAMS TCP source
>>># SCCS IDENTIFICATION
>>>127.0.0.1 localhost
>>>223.252.254.1 scosysv scosysv.default.com
>>>223.252.254.118 pc019 pc019.default.com
>>>223.252.254.109 pc010 Jura PC-NFS24A04767
>>>223.252.254.1 host1 host1.default.com
>>>223.252.254.201 host0 host0.default.com
>>>223.252.254.218 doc doc.default.com

>>>Now I want to add new addresses, so append

>>>192.160.2.76 my my.default.com

>>>close the host file... and what next?

>>That should be it. What problems are you having.

>Obviously, there is some problem, isn't it?
>(or I'm just bore...and want to write something (killing English and
>myself with it))

You did not answer the question? WHAT problems are you having.

What do you type and what error do you get would be a good start.
I'm neither a mind-reader nor a veterinarian - so at least a little
hint of the problem would help.

>>What has always struck me as odd is that SCO default
>>to IP alias fully-qualified-name, while the man page
>>say it is to be IP FQDN alias - as the rest of the world does.

>Tell me, you saw the beginning of this message
> ">>In sco (3.2v4.2) unix I have:"?

So - big deal I've been working with Unix system long before
System III came out. Even though TCP/IP wasn't there then.

>>>How to -hm- "(re)compile", rebuild, setup, configure... you know what
>>>I'm trying to say.

>>You don't have to.

>I think that I have to.
>Because if I put on 98, Me, Xp, 2K... in Local Network -> Properties
>...-> TCP/IP .... IP address which is on Unix (etc/host (and somwhere
>else?!)) stuff works.

What stuff works? And why are you expecting adding information
to the /etc/hosts file on an SCO machine should be visible to all
other machines on the network. That is why the 'local' part of
resolv.conf exists. So that the system {the Unix sysstem} will
read the /etc/hosts file before querying a DNS server, which may
be on another machine locally or a thousand miles away.

>BUT if I put new one in TCP/IP on xp, and the SAME (Bill) in etc/hosts
>from the unix side (story) - stuff DO NOT works.

>>WHAT<< stuff doesn't work.

>MENSA conclusion - something missing!

What is missing is a decription of the problem you are having.

>>>(tried with mkhost, but w/o success, when I want to approuch to the
>>>unix server from another computer (win xp) where I put the new
>>>(192.160.2.76) addrress under properties at Local Network, then start
>>>telnet...nada, zilch, zero, nothing).

>>>So, can someone tell me step-by-step how to cofigure, add new
>>>addresses or point me where to find GOOD enough description?

>>Just what problems are you having. If you are trying to resolve
>>the /etc/hosts from another machine that's not going to work.

>How come that it works with older address (xp -> unix)

What do you mean by "that"

>>You could set up DNS on your SCO machine.

>HOW?

No too hard.

> (">>So, can someone tell me step-by-step how to cofigure")

>As I saw, you do not read the whole message anyway. N'est pas?
>Here we talking about Open Server SCO unix Release 3.2v4.2.
>This is a pretty oldie guy.

Yup. I've been there and before.

>(why the older ">>223.252.254.118 pc019 pc019.default.com" address
>works?)

I don't know because I don't have access to your machine and you
have NOT given enough information to diagnose the problem.

>>Having the far machines address in the /etc/hosts file on
>>the SCO system will help with telnet, ssh, etc., as you
>>won't experience long delays.

>>You DO have to have /etc/resolv.conf on the SCO machine
>>setup with resorder local bind in order for the SCO
>>machine to use the /etc/hosts file first.

>No, I have not anywhere resolv.conf (and with old addresses
>works...hm!)

When you say 'with old addresses it work' - what old addresses.
Other machines on the 'net or the SCO machine.

Bill
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com

On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 00:25:09 GMT, bv@wjv.com (Bill Vermillion) wrote:

>In article <ghasq0hd3lrn587u5tgif8367olqlq8oc8@4ax.com>,
>El Krbaccha <krba@HotPOP.com> wrote:
>>On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 17:15:00 GMT, bv@wjv.com (Bill Vermillion) wrote:
>
>>>In article <atorq09jgbq03m1beiu7a8fk7ov0ejfjvn@4ax.com>,
>>>El Krbaccha <krba@HotPOP.com> wrote:
>>>>In sco (3.2v4.2) unix I have:
>>>>/etc/hosts
>
>>>># @(#)hosts 1.2 Lachman System V STREAMS TCP source
>>>># SCCS IDENTIFICATION
>>>>127.0.0.1 localhost
>>>>223.252.254.1 scosysv scosysv.default.com
>>>>223.252.254.118 pc019 pc019.default.com
>>>>223.252.254.109 pc010 Jura PC-NFS24A04767
>>>>223.252.254.1 host1 host1.default.com
>>>>223.252.254.201 host0 host0.default.com
>>>>223.252.254.218 doc doc.default.com
>
>>>>Now I want to add new addresses, so append
>
>>>>192.160.2.76 my my.default.com
>
>>>>close the host file... and what next?
>
>>>That should be it. What problems are you having.
>
>>Obviously, there is some problem, isn't it?
>>(or I'm just bore...and want to write something (killing English and
>>myself with it))
>
>You did not answer the question? WHAT problems are you having.

I came here to put the question, this is the first. Answering with
question is... what?
(do you see what a nice bla-bla conversation could be).

>What do you type and what error do you get would be a good start.

Dear Joh... khm Bill, read my lips - there is no error message, any
message at all.

>I'm neither a mind-reader nor a veterinarian - so at least a little

Yes, but also you forgot to write that you are pretty lazy. Something
like Harley-Davidson Owenrs...

Mind readers (or vetere....veteri... howewer, dr. Doolittle you are
not. It's visible. You'll be the happiest person if someone put a
question and answer on it...by himself.)

>hint of the problem would help.

Oh yes. I try to use *network* connection for RPG-enerator. But if it
possible to get Cobol sources out.
What we are talking about, here?

[cut]

>
>>>>How to -hm- "(re)compile", rebuild, setup, configure... you know what
>>>>I'm trying to say.
>
>>>You don't have to.
>
>>I think that I have to.
>>Because if I put on 98, Me, Xp, 2K... in Local Network -> Properties
>>...-> TCP/IP .... IP address which is on Unix (etc/host (and somwhere
>>else?!)) stuff works.
>
>What stuff works? And why are you expecting adding information
>to the /etc/hosts file on an SCO machine should be visible to all
>other machines on the network. That is why the 'local' part of
>resolv.conf exists. So that the system {the Unix sysstem} will
>read the /etc/hosts file before querying a DNS server, which may
>be on another machine locally or a thousand miles away.
>
>>BUT if I put new one in TCP/IP on xp, and the SAME (Bill) in etc/hosts
>>from the unix side (story) - stuff DO NOT works.
>
>>>WHAT<< stuff doesn't work.
>
>>MENSA conclusion - something missing!
>
>What is missing is a decription of the problem you are having.

ok. "There is a Hole in the Bucket, dear Bill, dear Bill..."

[cut]


hm...

well, see ya!

Thnx.

You are Bill's wife or what?
Please, be nice. Good bye.


On 1 Dec 2004 16:25:28 -0500, Jean-Pierre Radley <jpr@jpr.com> wrote:

>El Krbaccha typed (on Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 09:49:01PM +0100):
>| On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 17:15:00 GMT, bv@wjv.com (Bill Vermillion) wrote:
>|
>| >In article <atorq09jgbq03m1beiu7a8fk7ov0ejfjvn@4ax.com>,
>| >El Krbaccha <krba@HotPOP.com> wrote:
>| >>In sco (3.2v4.2) unix I have:
>| >>/etc/hosts
>| >
>| >># @(#)hosts 1.2 Lachman System V STREAMS TCP source
>| >># SCCS IDENTIFICATION
>| >>127.0.0.1 localhost
>| >>223.252.254.1 scosysv scosysv.default.com
>| >>223.252.254.118 pc019 pc019.default.com
>| >>223.252.254.109 pc010 Jura PC-NFS24A04767
>| >>223.252.254.1 host1 host1.default.com
>| >>223.252.254.201 host0 host0.default.com
>| >>223.252.254.218 doc doc.default.com
>| >
>| >>Now I want to add new addresses, so append
>| >
>| >>192.160.2.76 my my.default.com
>| >
>| >>close the host file... and what next?
>| >
>| >That should be it. What problems are you having.
>|
>| Obviously, there is some problem, isn't it?
>| (or I'm just bore...and want to write something (killing English and
>| myself with it))
>|
>| >What has always struck me as odd is that SCO default
>| >to IP alias fully-qualified-name, while the man page
>| >say it is to be IP FQDN alias - as the rest of the world does.
>|
>|
>| Tell me, you saw the beginning of this message
>| ">>In sco (3.2v4.2) unix I have:"?
>|
>| >>How to -hm- "(re)compile", rebuild, setup, configure... you know what
>| >>I'm trying to say.
>| >
>| >You don't have to.
>|
>| I think that I have to.
>
>NO, you do not.
>
>| Because if I put on 98, Me, Xp, 2K... in Local Network -> Properties
>| ...-> TCP/IP .... IP address which is on Unix (etc/host (and somwhere
>| else?!)) stuff works.
>|
>| BUT if I put new one in TCP/IP on xp, and the SAME (Bill) in etc/hosts
>| from the unix side (story) - stuff DO NOT works.
>
>Stuff? What stuff? What does not work? Which command did you type and
>how did it not work? What error message did you get?
>
>| MENSA conclusion - something missing!
>|
>| >>(tried with mkhost, but w/o success, when I want to approuch to the
>| >>unix server from another computer (win xp) where I put the new
>| >>(192.160.2.76) addrress under properties at Local Network, then start
>| >>telnet...nada, zilch, zero, nothing).
>| >
>| >>So, can someone tell me step-by-step how to cofigure, add new
>| >>addresses or point me where to find GOOD enough description?
>| >
>| >Just what problems are you having. If you are trying to resolve
>| >the /etc/hosts from another machine that's not going to work.
>|
>| How come that it works with older address (xp -> unix)
>|
>| >You could set up DNS on your SCO machine.
>|
>| HOW?
>| (">>So, can someone tell me step-by-step how to cofigure")
>|
>| As I saw, you do not read the whole message anyway. N'est pas?
>| Here we talking about Open Server SCO unix Release 3.2v4.2.
>| This is a pretty oldie guy.
>|
>|
>| (why the older ">>223.252.254.118 pc019 pc019.default.com" address
>| works?)
>|
>|
>| >Having the far machines address in the /etc/hosts file on
>| >the SCO system will help with telnet, ssh, etc., as you
>| >won't experience long delays.
>| >
>| >You DO have to have /etc/resolv.conf on the SCO machine
>| >setup with resorder local bind in order for the SCO
>| >machine to use the /etc/hosts file first.
>|
>| No, I have not anywhere resolv.conf (and with old addresses
>| works...hm!)
>|
>| >Bill
>|
>| Thank you Bill,
>|
>| (says Uma... )
>|

El Krbaccha wrote:

<argument>

http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

In article <7m00r01gh4nf8bo3u84jrg80p9r0drfsod@4ax.com>,
El Krbaccha <krba@HotPOP.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 00:25:09 GMT, bv@wjv.com (Bill Vermillion) wrote:
>
>>In article <ghasq0hd3lrn587u5tgif8367olqlq8oc8@4ax.com>,
>>El Krbaccha <krba@HotPOP.com> wrote:
>>>On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 17:15:00 GMT, bv@wjv.com (Bill Vermillion) wrote:
>>
>>>>In article <atorq09jgbq03m1beiu7a8fk7ov0ejfjvn@4ax.com>,
>>>>El Krbaccha <krba@HotPOP.com> wrote:
>>>>>In sco (3.2v4.2) unix I have:
>>>>>/etc/hosts
>>
>>>>># @(#)hosts 1.2 Lachman System V STREAMS TCP source
>>>>># SCCS IDENTIFICATION
>>>>>127.0.0.1 localhost
>>>>>223.252.254.1 scosysv scosysv.default.com
>>>>>223.252.254.118 pc019 pc019.default.com
>>>>>223.252.254.109 pc010 Jura PC-NFS24A04767
>>>>>223.252.254.1 host1 host1.default.com
>>>>>223.252.254.201 host0 host0.default.com
>>>>>223.252.254.218 doc doc.default.com
>>
>>>>>Now I want to add new addresses, so append
>>
>>>>>192.160.2.76 my my.default.com
>>
>>>>>close the host file... and what next?
>>
>>>>That should be it. What problems are you having.
>>
>>>Obviously, there is some problem, isn't it?
>>>(or I'm just bore...and want to write something (killing English and
>>>myself with it))
>>
>>You did not answer the question? WHAT problems are you having.
>
>I came here to put the question, this is the first. Answering with
>question is... what?
>(do you see what a nice bla-bla conversation could be).
>
>>What do you type and what error do you get would be a good start.
>
>Dear Joh... khm Bill, read my lips - there is no error message, any
>message at all.
>
>>I'm neither a mind-reader nor a veterinarian - so at least a little
>
>Yes, but also you forgot to write that you are pretty lazy. Something
>like Harley-Davidson Owenrs...
>
>Mind readers (or vetere....veteri... howewer, dr. Doolittle you are
>not. It's visible. You'll be the happiest person if someone put a
>question and answer on it...by himself.)
>
>>hint of the problem would help.
>
>Oh yes. I try to use *network* connection for RPG-enerator. But if it
>possible to get Cobol sources out.
>What we are talking about, here?
>
>[cut]
>
>>
>>>>>How to -hm- "(re)compile", rebuild, setup, configure... you know what
>>>>>I'm trying to say.
>>
>>>>You don't have to.
>>
>>>I think that I have to.
>>>Because if I put on 98, Me, Xp, 2K... in Local Network -> Properties
>>>...-> TCP/IP .... IP address which is on Unix (etc/host (and somwhere
>>>else?!)) stuff works.
>>
>>What stuff works? And why are you expecting adding information
>>to the /etc/hosts file on an SCO machine should be visible to all
>>other machines on the network. That is why the 'local' part of
>>resolv.conf exists. So that the system {the Unix sysstem} will
>>read the /etc/hosts file before querying a DNS server, which may
>>be on another machine locally or a thousand miles away.
>>
>>>BUT if I put new one in TCP/IP on xp, and the SAME (Bill) in etc/hosts
>>>from the unix side (story) - stuff DO NOT works.
>>
>>>>WHAT<< stuff doesn't work.
>>
>>>MENSA conclusion - something missing!

>>What is missing is a decription of the problem you are having.

>ok. "There is a Hole in the Bucket, dear Bill, dear Bill..."
>
>[cut]



Both JPR and I have tried to help you and we've both set up a lot
of networks. I've brought up 'nets with 500 machines in a weekend,
so I do think my questions asking what exactly was wrong were
legitimate.

But you appear not to want to divulge any information that will
help us get you going.

I'll go back to helping other people in a two-way diaglogue as I've
been doing on the 'net for close to 20 years.

Don't byte the hands that feeds you.

Bill

--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com