Hi Boys...

After while I am back to SCO 5.0.7.... but I have
a problems to find my info about activation numbers...
I tried SerNumber for version 5.0.4 and 5.0.5 and 5.0.6
and no luck I turned my room up side down and nothing...
Whole SCO Box is gone with wind...

Please by nice and send me some working ser numbers..
( I have a noncomertial version.... )

Thnx.... George.

On Sun, 05 Oct 2003 00:28:56 GMT, "gefi" <gefi90@rogers.com> wrote:

>Hi Boys...
>
>After while I am back to SCO 5.0.7.... but I have
>a problems to find my info about activation numbers...
>I tried SerNumber for version 5.0.4 and 5.0.5 and 5.0.6
>and no luck I turned my room up side down and nothing...
>Whole SCO Box is gone with wind...
>
>Please by nice and send me some working ser numbers..
>( I have a noncomertial version.... )
>
>Thnx.... George.

Install 3.2v5.0.7 maintenance pack #1.
See:
http://support.sco.com TA #12742
for some details on the problem.



--
# Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
# 831.336.2558 voice http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
# jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us
# 831.421.6491 digital_pager jeffl@cruzio.com AE6KS

Jeff Liebermann wrote (on Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 12:48:10AM +0000):
> On Sun, 05 Oct 2003 00:28:56 GMT, "gefi" <gefi90@rogers.com> wrote:
>
> >Hi Boys...
> >
> >After while I am back to SCO 5.0.7.... but I have
> >a problems to find my info about activation numbers...
> >I tried SerNumber for version 5.0.4 and 5.0.5 and 5.0.6
> >and no luck I turned my room up side down and nothing...
> >Whole SCO Box is gone with wind...
> >
> >Please by nice and send me some working ser numbers..
> >( I have a noncomertial version.... )
> >
> >Thnx.... George.
>
> Install 3.2v5.0.7 maintenance pack #1.
> See:
> http://support.sco.com TA #12742
> for some details on the problem.

Er, Jeff, don't you mean TA #120742?

> --
> # Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
> # 831.336.2558 voice http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
> # jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us
> # 831.421.6491 digital_pager jeffl@cruzio.com AE6KS

--
_________________________________________
Nachman Yaakov Ziskind, EA, LLM awacs@egps.com
Attorney and Counselor-at-Law http://ziskind.us
Economic Group Pension Services http://egps.com
Actuaries and Employee Benefit Consultants

On 4 Oct 2003 22:58:04 -0400, Nachman Yaakov Ziskind <awacs@egps.com>
wrote:

>Jeff Liebermann wrote (on Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 12:48:10AM +0000):
>> On Sun, 05 Oct 2003 00:28:56 GMT, "gefi" <gefi90@rogers.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Hi Boys...
>> >
>> >After while I am back to SCO 5.0.7.... but I have
>> >a problems to find my info about activation numbers...
>> >I tried SerNumber for version 5.0.4 and 5.0.5 and 5.0.6
>> >and no luck I turned my room up side down and nothing...
>> >Whole SCO Box is gone with wind...
>> >
>> >Please by nice and send me some working ser numbers..
>> >( I have a noncomertial version.... )
>> >
>> >Thnx.... George.
>>
>> Install 3.2v5.0.7 maintenance pack #1.
>> See:
>> http://support.sco.com TA #12742
>> for some details on the problem.
>
>Er, Jeff, don't you mean TA #120742?

Yeah, yeah, yeah and thanks. I dropped the zero. What's a zero worth
anyways? Besides, I got 7 more days to atone for last years screw ups
(I vowed to double check my sloppy postings). However, do I include
this one in last years list, or do I wait until next Yom Kippur?


--
# Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
# 831.336.2558 voice http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
# jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us
# 831.421.6491 digital_pager jeffl@cruzio.com AE6KS

In article <ta3vnvcv468h4uo2ghu7murpccph0sl0sa@4ax.com>,
Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us> wrote:
>On 4 Oct 2003 22:58:04 -0400, Nachman Yaakov Ziskind <awacs@egps.com>
>wrote:
>
>>Jeff Liebermann wrote (on Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 12:48:10AM +0000):
>>> On Sun, 05 Oct 2003 00:28:56 GMT, "gefi" <gefi90@rogers.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >Hi Boys...
>>> >
>>> >After while I am back to SCO 5.0.7.... but I have
>>> >a problems to find my info about activation numbers...
>>> >I tried SerNumber for version 5.0.4 and 5.0.5 and 5.0.6
>>> >and no luck I turned my room up side down and nothing...
>>> >Whole SCO Box is gone with wind...
>>> >
>>> >Please by nice and send me some working ser numbers..
>>> >( I have a noncomertial version.... )
>>> >
>>> >Thnx.... George.
>>>
>>> Install 3.2v5.0.7 maintenance pack #1.
>>> See:
>>> http://support.sco.com TA #12742
>>> for some details on the problem.
>>
>>Er, Jeff, don't you mean TA #120742?

>Yeah, yeah, yeah and thanks. I dropped the zero. What's a zero worth
>anyways? Besides, I got 7 more days to atone for last years screw ups
>(I vowed to double check my sloppy postings). However, do I include
>this one in last years list, or do I wait until next Yom Kippur?

I'd say wait. My philosophy is never do today what you can put off
until tomorrow. ;=0

--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com

On Sun, 05 Oct 2003 14:35:01 GMT, bv@wjv.com (Bill Vermillion) wrote:

>In article <ta3vnvcv468h4uo2ghu7murpccph0sl0sa@4ax.com>,
>Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us> wrote:
>>On 4 Oct 2003 22:58:04 -0400, Nachman Yaakov Ziskind <awacs@egps.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Jeff Liebermann wrote (on Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 12:48:10AM +0000):
>>>> On Sun, 05 Oct 2003 00:28:56 GMT, "gefi" <gefi90@rogers.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >Hi Boys...
>>>> >
>>>> >After while I am back to SCO 5.0.7.... but I have
>>>> >a problems to find my info about activation numbers...
>>>> >I tried SerNumber for version 5.0.4 and 5.0.5 and 5.0.6
>>>> >and no luck I turned my room up side down and nothing...
>>>> >Whole SCO Box is gone with wind...
>>>> >
>>>> >Please by nice and send me some working ser numbers..
>>>> >( I have a noncomertial version.... )
>>>> >
>>>> >Thnx.... George.
>>>>
>>>> Install 3.2v5.0.7 maintenance pack #1.
>>>> See:
>>>> http://support.sco.com TA #12742
>>>> for some details on the problem.

>>>Er, Jeff, don't you mean TA #120742?

>>Yeah, yeah, yeah and thanks. I dropped the zero. What's a zero worth
>>anyways? Besides, I got 7 more days to atone for last years screw ups
>>(I vowed to double check my sloppy postings). However, do I include
>>this one in last years list, or do I wait until next Yom Kippur?

>I'd say wait. My philosophy is never do today what you can put off
>until tomorrow. ;=0

Mine is:
"Never do today what you can get someone else to do
for you tomorrow"
Credit goes to a former employer who also believed that:
"Procrastination is the key to flexibility".
Of course, I was the one that got stuck with all the last minute fire
drills. Other slogans were:
"Planning is everything"
which resulted in 100% of the allotted project time being consumed by
meetings, and:
"The first step to solving a problem is to blame someone",
which is where I learned to gracefully accept denunciation.

That was a radical change from the previous employer, who advocated
and practiced:
"Do something, even if it's wrong",
which resulted in zero planning and everything being re-done at least
twice.

In any case, I have one more screw up to atone for. Yom Kippur starts
this Sunday eve, not in 7 days. I knew that but mistyped the number.
Too bad my spelling chequer can't catch that type of mistake.


--
Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
(831)421-6491 pgr (831)336-2558 home
http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS
jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us jeffl@cruzio.com

On Sun, Oct 05, 2003, Bill Vermillion wrote:
>In article <ta3vnvcv468h4uo2ghu7murpccph0sl0sa@4ax.com>,
>Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us> wrote:
....
>>Yeah, yeah, yeah and thanks. I dropped the zero. What's a zero worth
>>anyways? Besides, I got 7 more days to atone for last years screw ups
>>(I vowed to double check my sloppy postings). However, do I include
>>this one in last years list, or do I wait until next Yom Kippur?
>
>I'd say wait. My philosophy is never do today what you can put off
>until tomorrow. ;=0

A time management course I took many eons recommended classifying tasks as
``A'', ``B'', and ``C'' in order of importance, then only work on the
``A''s. If the others are important, they will be promoted to ``A''s, but
more often they just go away.

Bill
--
INTERNET: bill@Celestial.COM Bill Campbell; Celestial Systems, Inc.
UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way
FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676
URL: http://www.celestial.com/

Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But
I repeat myself. -- Mark Twain

Bill Campbell wrote:

> A time management course I took many eons recommended classifying tasks as
> ``A'', ``B'', and ``C'' in order of importance, then only work on the
> ``A''s. If the others are important, they will be promoted to ``A''s, but
> more often they just go away.

This thread I loved. I always knew there was something I missed about
SCO; I'd just wondered what. All the "old" people I knew and respected.

--Tonni

On Sun, 05 Oct 2003 00:28:56 GMT, "gefi" <gefi90@rogers.com> wrote:

>Hi Boys...
>
>After while I am back to SCO 5.0.7....

This is just sad. It's like reading about a former drug addict, who,
after having managed to clean themselves up, has now slipped back into
the crack-pipe, with Darl and his henchmen supplying the nasty hits...

--
FyRE < "War: The way Americans learn geography" >