vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Dan Skinner wrote: > There is an interesting line that seems to permeate this and similar > threads. > That line is that (and I'll exaggerate for affect) all the SCO systems > that have been running for years without Vendor (SCO) support and all > the newly installed 5.06 and 5.07 systems which are running smoothly will > suddenly fall into disrepair and need extensive support on the day SCO > "goes out of business." IF and when that should happen. > > Is that because without this assumption, the fear mongering would be > much less fearful? I don't disagree at all. However, SCO users should be at least investigating their options just in case. Of course, with Microsoft also attacking on the patent side, Linux users should take the same advice. Microsoft could possibly kill Samba with patents, and while that wouldn't kill all Linux use, it would destroy a lot of the value. That's not a pleasant thought, of course, but neither are many disasters we routinely insure against and maintain emergency planning for. Although opposed to the idea in principle, I was hoping that the Eola patent might put Microsoft users in a similar uneasy position, but it looks like that isn't going to happen. -- Tony Lawrence http://aplawrence.com/Lawsuit/ |