This is a discussion on Re: The Scotts Valley Operation? within the Sco Unix forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> Jeff Liebermann wrote: > The real question (from my warped perspective) is whether the courts > will enforce the ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Jeff Liebermann wrote: > The real question (from my warped perspective) is whether the courts > will enforce the *INTENT* of the Project Monterey contract. It is > obvious to even the most die hard Linux fanatic, that it was not SCO's > intent to just hand the UW7 source code to IBM, and have IBM deliver > zilch. I've asked practicing attorneys what the court might do. All > have said, toss a coin. Can't be, Jeff. All the evidence from GrokLaw says that SCO has no case and can't possibly win. Further, such eminent legal authorities as our own FyRE have repeatedly ridiculed any suggestion that anything other than a loss is possible. You must be lying. Obviously you must be one of those immoral SCO resellers we've been warned about. Seiously, as you noted in other posts, SCO should have stuck to this and hammered the hell out of it in PR. Dragging Linux and all the other crap into it was dumb, dumb, dumb. If they had left it at this, they might have even had a good percentage of Linux folk sympathetic to to their argument. -- Tony Lawrence |