Unix Technical Forum

SEO

vBulletin Search Engine Optimization


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > Sco Unix

Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2008, 04:51 PM
fernando.scheid@gmail.com
 
Posts: n/a
Default Routing Problem on OpenServer 5.0.6

Hi all,

I have one big problem with routing.

See my network diagram bellow:


+---------------------------+------------------------------
| |
OSR506A ROUTER-A (Linux Box)
192.168.10.10 192.168.10.254
|
|
|
FRAME-RELAY
|
|
|
ROUTER-B (Linux Box)
192.168.13.254
|
+-----------------------+-----------------------------
|
|
192.168.13.1 (net0)
OSR506B
129.168.100.1 (net1)
|
|
+-------------- FDDI -----------+
|
|
192.168.100.2 (net1)
OSR506C
129.12.130.3 (net0)


>From host OSR506A i can ping to ROUTER-A, ROUTER-B, OSR506B (net0),

OSR506B (net1), OSR506C (net0) and OSR506C (net1).


Traceroute from OSR506A to OSR506C runs fine too.

osr506a # traceroute 129.12.130.3
traceroute to 129.12.130.3 (129.12.130.3), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 192.168.10.254 (192.168.10.254) 0.481 ms 0.395 ms 0.001 ms
2 192.168.248.5 (192.168.248.5) 37.808 ms 39.336 ms 42.508 ms
(WAN)
3 osr506b (192.168.13.1) 32.190 ms 27.678 ms 39.581 ms
4 osr506c (129.12.130.3) 33.296 ms 25.877 ms 43.831 ms


But from host OSR506C i can not ping or traceroute to OSR506A.

osr506c # traceroute 192.168.10.10
traceroute to 192.168.10.10 (192.168.10.10), 30 hops max, 40 byte
packets
1 osr506b-gw (192.168.100.1) 0.481 ms 0.377 ms 0.339 ms
2 * * *
3 * * *
4 * * *
5 * * *
.. ... ... ...
... ... ... ...


Running a tcpdump on ROUTER-B and starting a ping from OSR506C
to ROUTER-B, no one package is displayed.

My first conclusion is that OSR506B is not forwarding packages.

The paramenters ipforwarding and ipsendredirects are set to 1
at the file /etc/default/inet on both servers.

The inconfig command show the same informations too.


OSR506A route table:

osr506a # netstat -nr
Routing tables
Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Interface
127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 3 426105 lo0
129.12.130 192.168.10.254 UGS 0 34 net0
192.168.10 192.168.10.10 UC 1 0 net0
192.168.10.10 127.0.0.1 UGHS 5 572 lo0
192.168.13 192.168.10.254 UGS 3 102 net0
224 192.168.10.10 UCS 0 0 net0


OSR506B route table:

osr506b # netstat -nr
Routing tables
Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Interface
127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 3 36341 lo0
129.12.130 192.168.100.2 UGS 1 32475 net1
192.168.10 192.168.13.254 UGS 8 236 net0
192.168.13 192.168.13.1 UC 1 0 net0
192.168.13.1 127.0.0.1 UGHS 4 49 lo0
192.168.100 192.168.100.1 UC 1 0 net1
192.168.100.1 127.0.0.1 UGHS 0 45 lo0
224 192.168.13.1 UCS 0 0 net0


OSR506C route table:

osr506c # netstat -nr
Routing tables
Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Interface
127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 3 488 lo0
129.12.130 129.12.130.3 UC 1 0 net0
129.12.130.3 127.0.0.1 UGHS 4 26 lo0
192.168.10 192.168.100.1 UGS 0 18 net1
192.168.13 192.168.100.1 UGS 3 1 net1
192.168.100 192.168.100.2 UC 1 0 net1
192.168.100.2 127.0.0.1 UGHS 0 0 lo0
224 129.12.130.3 UCS 0 0 net0


All servers have SCO OpenServer 5.0.6 with rs506a and all recomended
patches applied.

Any help will be apreciatted.


Excuse-me but my english is under construction

TIA,

Fernando

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2008, 04:51 PM
John Schmidt
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Routing Problem on OpenServer 5.0.6

<snippage throughout>

fernando.scheid@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have one big problem with routing.


Maybe not...

<snip>

>From host OSR506A i can ping to ROUTER-A, ROUTER-B, OSR506B (net0),
> OSR506B (net1), OSR506C (net0) and OSR506C (net1).


<snip>

> But from host OSR506C i can not ping or traceroute to OSR506A.


A quick glance at your routing tables looks like they're correct.

If ping and traceroute work in one direction but not another, it's more
than likely not a routing problem. For OSR506A to recieve the replies
from OSR506C when querying it, *both* machines have to know how to get
to each other. Unless there's a dynamic routing protocol running on any
of the boxes in the network path, you probably have a firewall rather
than a routing problem. From your traceroutes, the most likely culprit
is OSR506B.


JS
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2008, 04:51 PM
fernando.scheid@gmail.com
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Routing Problem on OpenServer 5.0.6


John Schmidt wrote:
> <snippage throughout>
>
> fernando.scheid@gmail.com wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have one big problem with routing.

>
> Maybe not...
>
> <snip>
>
> >From host OSR506A i can ping to ROUTER-A, ROUTER-B, OSR506B (net0),
> > OSR506B (net1), OSR506C (net0) and OSR506C (net1).

>
> <snip>
>
> > But from host OSR506C i can not ping or traceroute to OSR506A.

>
> A quick glance at your routing tables looks like they're correct.
>
> If ping and traceroute work in one direction but not another, it's

more
> than likely not a routing problem. For OSR506A to recieve the replies


> from OSR506C when querying it, *both* machines have to know how to

get
> to each other. Unless there's a dynamic routing protocol running on

any
> of the boxes in the network path, you probably have a firewall rather


> than a routing problem. From your traceroutes, the most likely

culprit
> is OSR506B.
>
>
> JS


John,

I can guarantee to you that there are no dynamic routing protocol
configured and no firewall in the network path.

The server osr506b does not forward the packages between the interfaces
when it originates from osr506c.

This behavior can be seen by the command traceroute.

The package is directed to interface 192.168.100.1 and dies.

Thanks for your attention.

Fernando

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2008, 04:51 PM
Simon Hobson
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Routing Problem on OpenServer 5.0.6

On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 20:52:48 +0100, fernando.scheid@gmail.com wrote
(in message <1112125968.333544.243040@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups .com>):

> Hi all,
>
> I have one big problem with routing.
>
> See my network diagram bellow:
>
>
> +---------------------------+------------------------------
> | |
> OSR506A ROUTER-A (Linux Box)
> 192.168.10.10 192.168.10.254
> |
> |
> |
> FRAME-RELAY
> |
> |
> |
> ROUTER-B (Linux Box)
> 192.168.13.254
> |
> +-----------------------+-----------------------------
> |
> |
> 192.168.13.1 (net0)
> OSR506B
> 129.168.100.1 (net1)
> |
> |
> +-------------- FDDI -----------+
> |
> |
> 192.168.100.2 (net1)
> OSR506C
> 129.12.130.3 (net0)
>
>
>> From host OSR506A i can ping to ROUTER-A, ROUTER-B, OSR506B (net0),

> OSR506B (net1), OSR506C (net0) and OSR506C (net1).
>
>
> Traceroute from OSR506A to OSR506C runs fine too.
>
> osr506a # traceroute 129.12.130.3
> traceroute to 129.12.130.3 (129.12.130.3), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
> 1 192.168.10.254 (192.168.10.254) 0.481 ms 0.395 ms 0.001 ms
> 2 192.168.248.5 (192.168.248.5) 37.808 ms 39.336 ms 42.508 ms
> (WAN)
> 3 osr506b (192.168.13.1) 32.190 ms 27.678 ms 39.581 ms
> 4 osr506c (129.12.130.3) 33.296 ms 25.877 ms 43.831 ms
>
>
> But from host OSR506C i can not ping or traceroute to OSR506A.
>
> osr506c # traceroute 192.168.10.10
> traceroute to 192.168.10.10 (192.168.10.10), 30 hops max, 40 byte
> packets
> 1 osr506b-gw (192.168.100.1) 0.481 ms 0.377 ms 0.339 ms
> 2 * * *
> 3 * * *
> 4 * * *
> 5 * * *
> .. ... ... ...
> ... ... ... ...
>
>
> Running a tcpdump on ROUTER-B and starting a ping from OSR506C
> to ROUTER-B, no one package is displayed.
>
> My first conclusion is that OSR506B is not forwarding packages.
>
> The paramenters ipforwarding and ipsendredirects are set to 1
> at the file /etc/default/inet on both servers.
>
> The inconfig command show the same informations too.
>
>
> OSR506A route table:
>
> osr506a # netstat -nr
> Routing tables
> Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Interface
> 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 3 426105 lo0
> 129.12.130 192.168.10.254 UGS 0 34 net0
> 192.168.10 192.168.10.10 UC 1 0 net0
> 192.168.10.10 127.0.0.1 UGHS 5 572 lo0
> 192.168.13 192.168.10.254 UGS 3 102 net0
> 224 192.168.10.10 UCS 0 0 net0
>
>
> OSR506B route table:
>
> osr506b # netstat -nr
> Routing tables
> Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Interface
> 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 3 36341 lo0
> 129.12.130 192.168.100.2 UGS 1 32475 net1
> 192.168.10 192.168.13.254 UGS 8 236 net0
> 192.168.13 192.168.13.1 UC 1 0 net0
> 192.168.13.1 127.0.0.1 UGHS 4 49 lo0
> 192.168.100 192.168.100.1 UC 1 0 net1
> 192.168.100.1 127.0.0.1 UGHS 0 45 lo0
> 224 192.168.13.1 UCS 0 0 net0
>
>
> OSR506C route table:
>
> osr506c # netstat -nr
> Routing tables
> Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Interface
> 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 3 488 lo0
> 129.12.130 129.12.130.3 UC 1 0 net0
> 129.12.130.3 127.0.0.1 UGHS 4 26 lo0
> 192.168.10 192.168.100.1 UGS 0 18 net1
> 192.168.13 192.168.100.1 UGS 3 1 net1
> 192.168.100 192.168.100.2 UC 1 0 net1
> 192.168.100.2 127.0.0.1 UGHS 0 0 lo0
> 224 129.12.130.3 UCS 0 0 net0
>
>
> All servers have SCO OpenServer 5.0.6 with rs506a and all recomended
> patches applied.
>
> Any help will be apreciatted.


Your routing tables are incorrect

When you ping from osr506A to 129.12.130.3, there is a route in the osr506A
server (and the osr506B server/router) to the network 129.12.130.0. Also,
osr506C and osr506B both have routes back to the network 192.168.10.0.
Result: Pings work.

Now ping A from C. C (and B) both have routes to 192.168.10.0 - hence the
outgoing packet will arrive. osr506B replies and the reply arrives because
osr506B is directly connected to the net 192.168.100.0. However, osr506A
cannot reply because it has no route to 192.168.100.0 - and from the fact
that you don't see replies from the two Linux routers suggest that they too
are missing this route.

If you were to try "ping -S 192.12.130.3 192.168.10.10 on the osr506C machine
then it may work because the reply packets will be routed to the 192.12.130.3
address instead of the unroutable 192.168.100.2 address.


As you will now realise, it is 110% vital that all your routing tables are
correct.

Personally, I prefer to avoid routing tables in hosts as much as possible as
it is nearly always possible to do it all in the routers. Assuming that there
are no other networks involved, then you could simplify your routing tables
thus (leaving out the system inserted stuff for clarity) :

OSR506A route table:

Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Interface
0.0.0.0 192.168.10.254


OSR506B route table:

osr506b # netstat -nr
Routing tables
Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Interface
129.12.130 192.168.100.2 UGS 1 32475 net1
192.168.10 192.168.13.254 UGS 8 236 net0


OSR506C route table:

osr506c # netstat -nr
Routing tables
Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Interface
0.0.0.0 129.168.100.1


This means that osr506A will send all traffic for non-local networks to the
router at 192.168.10.254 and need know nothing more about the route it takes.

Similarly, osr506C will send all non-local traffic via 129.168.100.1 and not
care about what route it takes after that.

Obviously, osr506B needs to know about the routes to all other networks as it
is a router itself. Similarly, the two Linux router must have full knowledge
of how to reach all networks.


As far as osr506A is concerned, it doesn't matter even if you have another
router on the 192.168.10.0 network - if the correct route for a packet isn't
via 192.168.10.254 then it will receive an ICMP-redirect message telling it
the correct route (assuming the routers are correctly configured).

Simon

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2008, 04:51 PM
fernando.scheid@gmail.com
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Routing Problem on OpenServer 5.0.6

Simon,

BINGO BINGO BINGO !!!!

The routes for network 192.168.100.X had been created and ping
functions in both directions.

A thousand times I am thankful !!!!

Fernando

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
UnixAdminTalk.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849