SCO Group admits it may fold

http://www.news.com/SCO-Group-admits...3-6208988.html

-RFH

That would really be too bad. Does anyone out there know which of the
Linux/Unix versions out there most closely resembles UnixWare 7. I hope
that UW continues in some fashion, but would like to make contingency plans.
Seems to me at one time Solaris was close??


"Ramon F Herrera" <ramon@conexus.net> wrote in message
news:1190355952.551965.244510@50g2000hsm.googlegro ups.com...
>
> SCO Group admits it may fold
>
> http://www.news.com/SCO-Group-admits...3-6208988.html
>
> -RFH
>

On Sep 20, 11:25 pm, Ramon F Herrera <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
> SCO Group admits it may fold
>
> http://www.news.com/SCO-Group-admits...1014_3-6208988....
>
> -RFH

Enough FUD already. The "quotation" in the title of this thread
doesn't appear in the CNet article cited or in its source, the SEC 10Q
in which management is required to acknowledge the gloomiest
possibilities.

--RLR

On Sep 21, 5:27 pm, "Ron Kirschner" <r...@jedron.com> wrote:
> That would really be too bad. Does anyone out there know which of the
> Linux/Unix versions out there most closely resembles UnixWare 7. I hope
> that UW continues in some fashion, but would like to make contingency plans.
> Seems to me at one time Solaris was close??
>
> "Ramon F Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in messagenews:1190355952.551965.244510@50g2000hsm.go oglegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > SCO Group admits it may fold
>
> >http://www.news.com/SCO-Group-admits...1014_3-6208988....
>
> > -RFH


Solaris is SysV Unix. Transition from OpenServer to Solaris 8/9 was
fairly easy. I suppose that the road from UnixWare should be even
easier. Solaris 10 is free and gains support among major Intel/AMD
based server vendors (HP, IBM etc) and software vendors (Oracle and
IBM databases again have their new ports for Solaris x86-64).

Darko Krstic

On Sep 21, 11:50 am, ThreeStar <s...@3starsoftware.com> wrote:
> On Sep 20, 11:25 pm, Ramon F Herrera <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
>
> > SCO Group admits it may fold
>
> >http://www.news.com/SCO-Group-admits...1014_3-6208988....
>
> > -RFH
>
> Enough FUD already. The "quotation" in the title of this thread
> doesn't appear in the CNet article cited or in its source, the SEC 10Q
> in which management is required to acknowledge the gloomiest
> possibilities.
>
> --RLR

Hmm, let's see. I wrote a slightly modified version of the quotation,
and you tell your boss and stockholders: "please don't fire me! I was
all fault of this Ramon guy on the Internet, who changed the
quotation. Therefore all those rumors about SCO have to be FUD
invented by him!".

If you didn't make plans to abandon SCO's ship when this lawsuit
started you deserve to be fired on the spot.

-Ramon

In article <fd0nsf$27s$1@aioe.org> "Ron Kirschner" <ron@jedron.com> writes:
$That would really be too bad. Does anyone out there know which of the
$Linux/Unix versions out there most closely resembles UnixWare 7. I hope
$that UW continues in some fashion, but would like to make contingency plans.

If SCO does indeed blink out of existence (and I'm not sufficiently
informed to assess the likelihood of this), it will leave creditors,
who will fight over the remnants, including UnixWare. Will the
creditors decide that UnixWare is worth keeping alive and even
producing as an ongoing product line? I dunno. Maybe they will,
maybe they won't.

You would definitely be wise to make contingency plans. But even
if SCO does fail entirely, that doesn't necessarily mean all of its
products are dead.
--
Stephen M. Dunn <stephen@stevedunn.ca>
>>>----------------> http://www.stevedunn.ca/ <----------------<<<
------------------------------------------------------------------
Say hi to my cat -- http://www.stevedunn.ca/photos/toby/

On Sat, Sep 22, 2007, Stephen M. Dunn wrote:
>In article <fd0nsf$27s$1@aioe.org> "Ron Kirschner" <ron@jedron.com> writes:
>$That would really be too bad. Does anyone out there know which of the
>$Linux/Unix versions out there most closely resembles UnixWare 7. I hope
>$that UW continues in some fashion, but would like to make contingency plans.
>
> If SCO does indeed blink out of existence (and I'm not sufficiently
>informed to assess the likelihood of this), it will leave creditors,
>who will fight over the remnants, including UnixWare. Will the
>creditors decide that UnixWare is worth keeping alive and even
>producing as an ongoing product line? I dunno. Maybe they will,
>maybe they won't.

SCO hasn't been doing much in the way of new development on their Unix
products for years.

I know people who are still supporting customers running SCO Xenix, and
even one or two supporting Xenix on Tandy 16/6000 machines. I still have a
Xenix box and an SCO 3.2v4 system in my rack, but they haven't been booted
for about seven years now.

> You would definitely be wise to make contingency plans. But even
>if SCO does fail entirely, that doesn't necessarily mean all of its
>products are dead.

In this business making contingency plans is absolutely vital if one wants
to stay in business. We still have a few OpenServer customers, and one
5.0.6a system in-house used to support them, but our main emphasis has been
on Linux systems for almost a decade.

In point of fact, we installed our first mission-critical Linux system ten
years ago this month, Ironically, that was the then current Caldera
distribution. I don't remember whether we first became SCO Authrized
Resellers in 1987 or 1988. We one of the first Caldera resellers (which
isn't surprising as Caldera made a concerted push to recruit SCO's
resellers).

Bill
--
INTERNET: bill@celestial.com Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC
URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way
FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676

Bagdikian's Observation:
Trying to be a first-rate reporter on the average American
newspaper is like trying to play Bach's "St. Matthew Passion"
on a ukelele.

On Sep 21, 4:42 pm, Ramon F Herrera <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
> On Sep 21, 11:50 am, ThreeStar <s...@3starsoftware.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sep 20, 11:25 pm, Ramon F Herrera <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
>
> > > SCO Group admits it may fold
>
> > >http://www.news.com/SCO-Group-admits...1014_3-6208988....
>
> > > -RFH
>
> > Enough FUD already. The "quotation" in the title of this thread
> > doesn't appear in the CNet article cited or in its source, the SEC 10Q
> > in which management is required to acknowledge the gloomiest
> > possibilities.
>
> > --RLR
>
> Hmm, let's see. I wrote a slightly modified version of the quotation,
> and you tell your boss and stockholders: "please don't fire me! I was
> all fault of this Ramon guy on the Internet, who changed the
> quotation. Therefore all those rumors about SCO have to be FUD
> invented by him!".
>
> If you didn't make plans to abandon SCO's ship when this lawsuit
> started you deserve to be fired on the spot.
>
> -Ramon

If it wasn't said, it's not a quote. Commandment #9.

Ask Dan Rather about the connection between using fake quotes and
getting fired.

--RLR

On Sep 21, 11:50 am, ThreeStar <s...@3starsoftware.com> wrote:
> On Sep 20, 11:25 pm, Ramon F Herrera <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
>
> > SCO Group admits it may fold
>
> >http://www.news.com/SCO-Group-admits...1014_3-6208988....
>
> > -RFH
>
> Enough FUD already. The "quotation" in the title of this thread
> doesn't appear in the CNet article cited or in its source, the SEC 10Q
> in which management is required to acknowledge the gloomiest
> possibilities.
>
> --RLR

http://edgar.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/...33836e10vq.htm,
section 1, paragraph 3:

"As a result of both the Court's August 10, 2007 ruling and the
Company's entry into Chapter 11, there is substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern."

On Sep 21, 2:25 am, Ramon F Herrera <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
> SCO Group admits it may fold
>
> http://www.news.com/SCO-Group-admits...1014_3-6208988....
>
> -RFH

I can't imagine anyone is particularly surprised.

I've been moving my business away from SCO for many years now.. still
have some SCO clients left, but not many..

--
Tony Lawrence
http://aplawrence.com/OSR5
http://aplawrence.com/SCOFAQ