This is a discussion on "bsd.port.mk Need an operator" -- how come? within the comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.misc forums, part of the OpenBSD category; --> hi there, i'm trying to rebuild libiconv from ports, but i get the following error message: ( i'm running ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| hi there, i'm trying to rebuild libiconv from ports, but i get the following error message: ( i'm running 3.4-current ): --------------------------[quote begin]----------------------------- # make "/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk", line 3: Need an operator "/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk", line 7: Need an operator "/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk", line 67: Need an operator "/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk", line 193: Need an operator "/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk", line 243: Need an operator "/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk", line 2913: Unclosed conditional 1 open conditional at line 244 of /usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk Fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue ---------------------------[quote end]------------------------------ i looked at the file bsd.port.mk, there are lots of special marks in this file, seems come from cvs tags: --------------------------[quote begin]----------------------------- <<<<<<< bsd.port.mk # $OpenBSD: bsd.port.mk,v 1.602 2004/01/22 21:28:49 espie Exp $ ======= # $OpenBSD: bsd.port.mk,v 1.611 2004/02/07 22:36:13 espie Exp $ >>>>>>> 1.611 # $FreeBSD: bsd.port.mk,v 1.264 1996/12/25 02:27:44 imp Exp $ # $NetBSD: bsd.port.mk,v 1.62 1998/04/09 12:47:02 hubertf Exp $ ---------------------------[quote end]------------------------------ is it normal for an .mk file? how can i build the libiconv? i need this urgently for my other tools like ssh, samba, vim, fetchmail, etc. thanks for any hint in advance. Lijun |
| |||
| Dixitur illum spam.is@bad.org scribere... ><<<<<<< bsd.port.mk ># $OpenBSD: bsd.port.mk,v 1.602 2004/01/22 21:28:49 espie Exp $ >======= ># $OpenBSD: bsd.port.mk,v 1.611 2004/02/07 22:36:13 espie Exp $ >>>>>>>> 1.611 $ info cvs //Thorsten -- Solange man keine schmutzigen Tricks macht, und ich meine *wirklich* schmutzige Tricks, wie bei einer doppelt verketteten Liste beide Pointer XORen und in nur einem Word speichern, funktioniert Boehm ganz hervorragend. -- Andreas Bogk über boehm-gc in d.a.s.r |
| |||
| anon <spam.is@bad.org> wrote in news:c1v3ao$8vq$07$2@news.t-online.com: > --------------------------[quote begin]----------------------------- > <<<<<<< bsd.port.mk > # $OpenBSD: bsd.port.mk,v 1.602 2004/01/22 21:28:49 espie Exp $ > ======= > # $OpenBSD: bsd.port.mk,v 1.611 2004/02/07 22:36:13 espie Exp $ >>>>>>>> 1.611 > # $FreeBSD: bsd.port.mk,v 1.264 1996/12/25 02:27:44 imp Exp $ > # $NetBSD: bsd.port.mk,v 1.62 1998/04/09 12:47:02 hubertf Exp $ > ---------------------------[quote end]------------------------------ This is conflict markers from a cvs update Rerun the update with -C e.g.: cvs update -CPAd -- Peter Strömberg C2K2 C2K3 ISCCIV02 ISCCIV03 |