SEO
vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
02-16-2008, 06:44 AM
| ||||
| ||||
 ELF or a.out? What is NetBSD using? -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@nl2k.ab.ca God Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising! nk.ca started 1 June 1995      |
|
02-16-2008, 06:44 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: ELF or a.out? In article <pan.2005.06.05.23.49.29.491886@yahoo.com>, Dave Uhring <daveuhring@yahoo.com> wrote: >On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 22:31:19 +0000, The Doctor wrote: > >> What is NetBSD using? > >ELF. But *why* did you ask that in an OpenBSD group? > Because binutils thinks OPenBSD, BSD/OS and probably other BSDs are using a.out . What do you expect when Red Hat is keeping binutils developed? -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@nl2k.ab.ca God Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising! nk.ca started 1 June 1995 |
|
02-16-2008, 06:44 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: ELF or a.out? On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 00:20:10 +0000, The Doctor wrote: > In article <pan.2005.06.05.23.49.29.491886@yahoo.com>, > Dave Uhring <daveuhring@yahoo.com> wrote: >>On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 22:31:19 +0000, The Doctor wrote: >> >>> What is NetBSD using? >> >>ELF. But *why* did you ask that in an OpenBSD group? >> > > Because binutils thinks OPenBSD, BSD/OS and > probably other BSDs are using a.out . What do you expect when Red Hat > is keeping binutils developed? Then why are you using the GNU binutils rather than the set of utilities which are integral with the BSDs? I don't have a NetBSD system on line right now but: # file /usr/bin/perl /usr/bin/perl: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1, for OpenBSD, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), not stripped That executable was certainly created using OpenBSD's binutils. |
|
02-16-2008, 06:44 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: ELF or a.out? In article <d859jm$p0m$1@news.ya.com>, dieymir <dieymir@yahoo.es> wrote: >The Doctor wrote: > >> What is NetBSD using? >If I remember well NetBSD 1.5 used ELF, I'm absolutely sure that 1.6.x does >(current is 2.0.2) > >Hope this helps. Let the binutils list know. They think BSD still uses a.out and never changed. -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@nl2k.ab.ca God Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising! nk.ca started 1 June 1995 |
|
02-16-2008, 06:44 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: ELF or a.out? > Let the binutils list know. They think > BSD still uses a.out and never changed. Care to explain why there are so many *BSD ELF configurations in binutils, then? The fact that old BSD a.out configurations still exist for compatibility with older systems does not mean they are choosen by default. |
|
02-16-2008, 06:44 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: ELF or a.out? In article <42a69cbc$0$24372$626a14ce@news.free.fr>, Miod Vallat <miod@online.fr> wrote: >> Let the binutils list know. They think >> BSD still uses a.out and never changed. > >Care to explain why there are so many *BSD ELF configurations in >binutils, then? The fact that old BSD a.out configurations still exist >for compatibility with older systems does not mean they are choosen by >default. Still, I cannot stand it when LinSUCKers think BSDs are still a.out . -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@nl2k.ab.ca God Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising! nk.ca started 1 June 1995 |
|
02-16-2008, 06:44 AM
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: ELF or a.out? > Still, I cannot stand it when LinSUCKers think > BSDs are still a.out . Still, I doubt Linux people can stand when people call them ``LinSUCKers''. Plus, both NetBSD and OpenBSD still use a.out binaries on some (non mainstream) platforms. So they can't be totally wrong on this. |
Linear Mode
