Why isn't getfacl and setfacl available in OpenBSD 3.7? Is there any
other shell based commands available to view and edit ACLs in the
filesystem?

Thanks in advance
Sulan

In article <1184663386.562478.71520@g12g2000prg.googlegroups. com>,
zulu <swebichon@yahoo.se> wrote:
>Why isn't getfacl and setfacl available in OpenBSD 3.7? Is there any
>other shell based commands available to view and edit ACLs in the
>filesystem?

There are no ACLs in OpenBSD.

On Jul 17, 11:32 am, es...@lain.home (Marc Espie) wrote:
> In article <1184663386.562478.71...@g12g2000prg.googlegroups. com>,
>
> zulu <swebic...@yahoo.se> wrote:
> >Why isn't getfacl and setfacl available in OpenBSD 3.7? Is there any
> >other shell based commands available to view and edit ACLs in the
> >filesystem?
>
> There are no ACLs in OpenBSD.

Okay, thanks. That explains it :-)

Any clues on how to force all files in a directory to get file
permissions 770? I have defined directory permission 2770 on the
directory and users use umask 007 but users still get "permission
denied" errors when using this temp directory over Subversion (and yes
all users belong the the group that owns the directory)?

zulu <swebichon@yahoo.se> wrote:
> On Jul 17, 11:32 am, es...@lain.home (Marc Espie) wrote:
>> In article <1184663386.562478.71...@g12g2000prg.googlegroups. com>,
>>
>> zulu <swebic...@yahoo.se> wrote:
>> >Why isn't getfacl and setfacl available in OpenBSD 3.7? Is there any
>> >other shell based commands available to view and edit ACLs in the
>> >filesystem?
>>
>> There are no ACLs in OpenBSD.
>
> Okay, thanks. That explains it :-)
>
> Any clues on how to force all files in a directory to get file
> permissions 770? I have defined directory permission 2770 on the
> directory and users use umask 007 but users still get "permission
> denied" errors when using this temp directory over Subversion (and yes
> all users belong the the group that owns the directory)?

Could you explain your setup in a little more detail? What you ask for
isn´t possible - programs can always set their own umask - but there is
almost certainly another solution to the real problem.

Joachim