This is a discussion on Re: Three way bridge? within the comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.misc forums, part of the OpenBSD category; --> "Peter Bako" <peter.bako@comcast.net> wrote in message news:0_DPa.35032$wk6.8323@rwcrnsc52.ops.asp.att.ne t... > Is it possible to use a single OpenBSD system with ...
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| "Peter Bako" <peter.bako@comcast.net> wrote in message news:0_DPa.35032$wk6.8323@rwcrnsc52.ops.asp.att.ne t... > Is it possible to use a single OpenBSD system with three interfaces where > the WAN interface does not have an IP address, the DMZ has a /28 range and > the LAN side is on a NAT? > > Our ISP gave us a /28 range of IP addresses directly out of our router. > They cannot provide a single IP outside of this range that I would use as > the WAN address of a traditional firewall so I installed a bride. I did not > bind an IP address to the WAN side, but rather assigned the .1 address to > the LAN side. This way the systems behind the bridge can use the IP range > and still have protection. > > The problem is that we need more IP addresses. The ISP cannot (or will not) > provide more for us and frankly I don't really need them to. For my > internal users I'd rather use an invalid range via NAT and keep the actual > IP addresses for my public servers on the DMZ. But without one more IP for > the WAN range I cannot make this work and I don't know if its possible for a > three way bridge. > > Any suggestions? Why not redirect those extra addresses to your DMZ (Bidirectional NAT-ing)? Another Peter |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|