SEO
vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
02-16-2008, 04:31 AM
| ||||
| ||||
 Re: using route command to only display inet family routing table? On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, mr_scary wrote: > This is the best I can do: > > $ route -n show > > But I get inet6 stuff. Is there any way to cut this out. No hacks > please. route -n show -inet -- "First, it was not a strip bar, it was an erotic club. And second, what can I say? I'm a night owl." - M. Barry, Mayor of Washington, DC      |
|
02-16-2008, 04:31 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: using route command to only display inet family routing table? On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 20:25:48 -0700, Ted Unangst <tedu@stanford.edu> said the following: >On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, mr_scary wrote: > >> This is the best I can do: >> >> $ route -n show >> >> But I get inet6 stuff. Is there any way to cut this out. No hacks >> please. > >route -n show -inet Damn. How did I miss that? Thanks. |
|
02-16-2008, 04:32 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: using route command to only display inet family routing table? mr_scary wrote: > On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 20:25:48 -0700, Ted Unangst <tedu@stanford.edu> > said the following: > >>On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, mr_scary wrote: >> >>> This is the best I can do: >>> >>> $ route -n show >>> >>> But I get inet6 stuff. Is there any way to cut this out. No hacks >>> please. >> >>route -n show -inet > > Damn. How did I miss that? > Because you were angry with netstat? :-) EJ -- Remove the obvious part (including the dot) for my email address |
|
02-16-2008, 04:32 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: using route command to only display inet family routing table? On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 22:05:44 +0200, erik <erik@geenspam.vanwesten.net> said the following: >mr_scary wrote: > >> On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 20:25:48 -0700, Ted Unangst <tedu@stanford.edu> >> said the following: >> >>>On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, mr_scary wrote: >>> >>>> This is the best I can do: >>>> >>>> $ route -n show >>>> >>>> But I get inet6 stuff. Is there any way to cut this out. No hacks >>>> please. >>> >>>route -n show -inet >> >> Damn. How did I miss that? >> > >Because you were angry with netstat? :-) Well it's pretty embarrassing. I thought I had tried all combinations of the route command. For sure ' route -n show inet '. Neglected the ' - ' sign. |
|
02-16-2008, 04:32 AM
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: using route command to only display inet family routing table? mr_scary wrote: > > Well it's pretty embarrassing. I thought I had tried all combinations > of the route command. For sure ' route -n show inet '. Neglected the > ' - ' sign. Fortunately I _never_ make mistakes like that. The rest of this group also never makes this mistake. ;-) EJ -- Remove the obvious part (including the dot) for my email address |
Linear Mode
