vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Hi folks, I hope this one is easy for any one of you, its got me stumped. I've been collapsing most of my DMZ into a multihomed server. I still have separate servers for mail relay and mail hub, but I am finding that for mail originating internally, and destined to another internal recipient with a generic email address, the relay sendmail is not translating the generic emails into the hub email address, and the mails get stuck in the relay's spool directory with a "hostname lookup failure" from the hub. The multihomed server is also using split-horizon dns for routable external and non-routable internal domain addresses; could it be that that's the cause of the problem? MK |
| |||
| MK wrote: > Hi folks, > I hope this one is easy for any one of you, its got me stumped. > I've been collapsing most of my DMZ into a multihomed server. > I still have separate servers for mail relay and mail hub, but I am > finding that for mail originating internally, and destined to another > internal recipient with a generic email address, the relay sendmail is > not translating the generic emails into the hub email address, and the > mails get stuck in the relay's spool directory with a "hostname lookup > failure" from the hub. > The multihomed server is also using split-horizon dns for routable > external and non-routable internal domain addresses; could it be that > that's the cause of the problem? To me that is a likely cause of errors. How would the relay know that these users are internal recipients? EJ -- Remove the obvious part (including the dot) for my email address. http://www.vanwesten.net for examples of ipf and pf. |
| |||
| erik wrote: > MK wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > I hope this one is easy for any one of you, its got me stumped. > > I've been collapsing most of my DMZ into a multihomed server. > > I still have separate servers for mail relay and mail hub, but I am > > finding that for mail originating internally, and destined to another > > internal recipient with a generic email address, the relay sendmail is > > not translating the generic emails into the hub email address, and the > > mails get stuck in the relay's spool directory with a "hostname lookup > > failure" from the hub. > > The multihomed server is also using split-horizon dns for routable > > external and non-routable internal domain addresses; could it be that > > that's the cause of the problem? > > To me that is a likely cause of errors. How would the relay know that > these users are internal recipients? > Could have been the case. I stopped natting outbounds through the principal interface and the symptom has improved from 'chronic' to 'endemic', instead of all failing and I having to retouch q-files, now they fail only sometimes, and the spool clears by itself when I reset sendmail. I suspect if I upgrade to the latest version and arp patch the problem could go away altogether. But 3.5's round the corner. I better report my 3.4 SCSI 'symptoms' B4 end of March. MK |
| |||
| mkhomo wrote: > erik wrote: > > > MK wrote: > > > > > Hi folks, > > > I hope this one is easy for any one of you, its got me stumped. > > > I've been collapsing most of my DMZ into a multihomed server. > > > I still have separate servers for mail relay and mail hub, but I am > > > finding that for mail originating internally, and destined to another > > > internal recipient with a generic email address, the relay sendmail is > > > not translating the generic emails into the hub email address, and the > > > mails get stuck in the relay's spool directory with a "hostname lookup > > > failure" from the hub. > > > The multihomed server is also using split-horizon dns for routable > > > external and non-routable internal domain addresses; could it be that > > > that's the cause of the problem? > > > > To me that is a likely cause of errors. How would the relay know that > > these users are internal recipients? > > > > Could have been the case. I stopped natting outbounds through the principal > interface and the symptom has improved from 'chronic' to 'endemic', instead > of all failing and I having to retouch q-files, now they fail only > sometimes, and the spool clears by itself when I reset sendmail. I suspect > if I upgrade to the latest version and arp patch the problem could go away > altogether. > I take back this arp theory (see my arp warnings thread). But my jury is still out on my concurrence with eric, it'll take some time to verify the apparent work-around. Moreover my ng spammers are awfully quiet; makes me nervous... Where are you guys? Work with me > > But 3.5's round the corner. I better report my 3.4 SCSI 'symptoms' B4 end > of March. I better get on with this. The Onstream SCSI tape behaves much better in 386/3.4 than 386/3.3, but still generates errors. > > > MK |
| |||
| mkhomo wrote: > ...Moreover my ng spammers are awfully quiet; makes me nervous... > Where are you guys? Work with me > Only 13 new spam sources from this whole wild web? I wanna buy all your stuff(s) Come on agents, (as he palm flaps a menacing invitation). Sell me your enlargers, invigorators, herbs & spices, medicines, lotto numbers, ....I want to buy it all, Now! MK PS Sorry folks this is a live test. |
| |||
| mkhomo wrote: > mkhomo wrote: > >> ...Moreover my ng spammers are awfully quiet; makes me nervous... >> Where are you guys? Work with me >> > > Only 13 new spam sources from this whole wild web? > I wanna buy all your stuff(s) Come on agents, (as he palm flaps a > menacing invitation). > > Sell me your enlargers, invigorators, herbs & spices, medicines, > lotto numbers, ...I want to buy it all, Now! > > MK > PS Sorry folks this is a live test. I have some 3100 spammails on stock for feeding spamassassin. Interested? :-) EJ -- Remove the obvious part (including the dot) for my email address. http://www.vanwesten.net for examples of ipf and pf. |
| ||||
| erik wrote: .... > I have some 3100 spammails on stock for feeding spamassassin. > Interested? :-) > > EJ Guess Not. More interesting from fresh open relays and 'mules', but I already have 8700 private access entries and counting.... Turning back to the subject, I'm finding all sorts of failed wiring (which may have started my 'arp' symptoms). I wish I knew the lifespan of twisted pair or of its corrosion of contacts. I have wiring that's a good 10yrs in service, and am finding new surprises every day as I restructure the network. MK |