Unix Technical Forum

SEO

vBulletin Search Engine Optimization


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > OpenBSD > comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.misc

Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-16-2008, 05:22 AM
MK
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sendmail Masquerading on Multihomed mail Relay

Hi folks,
I hope this one is easy for any one of you, its got me stumped.
I've been collapsing most of my DMZ into a multihomed server.
I still have separate servers for mail relay and mail hub, but I am
finding that for mail originating internally, and destined to another
internal recipient with a generic email address, the relay sendmail is
not translating the generic emails into the hub email address, and the
mails get stuck in the relay's spool directory with a "hostname lookup
failure" from the hub.
The multihomed server is also using split-horizon dns for routable
external and non-routable internal domain addresses; could it be that
that's the cause of the problem?

MK



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-16-2008, 05:22 AM
erik
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Sendmail Masquerading on Multihomed mail Relay

MK wrote:

> Hi folks,
> I hope this one is easy for any one of you, its got me stumped.
> I've been collapsing most of my DMZ into a multihomed server.
> I still have separate servers for mail relay and mail hub, but I am
> finding that for mail originating internally, and destined to another
> internal recipient with a generic email address, the relay sendmail is
> not translating the generic emails into the hub email address, and the
> mails get stuck in the relay's spool directory with a "hostname lookup
> failure" from the hub.
> The multihomed server is also using split-horizon dns for routable
> external and non-routable internal domain addresses; could it be that
> that's the cause of the problem?


To me that is a likely cause of errors. How would the relay know that
these users are internal recipients?

EJ
--
Remove the obvious part (including the dot) for my email address.
http://www.vanwesten.net for examples of ipf and pf.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-16-2008, 05:22 AM
mkhomo
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Sendmail Masquerading on Multihomed mail Relay

erik wrote:

> MK wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
> > I hope this one is easy for any one of you, its got me stumped.
> > I've been collapsing most of my DMZ into a multihomed server.
> > I still have separate servers for mail relay and mail hub, but I am
> > finding that for mail originating internally, and destined to another
> > internal recipient with a generic email address, the relay sendmail is
> > not translating the generic emails into the hub email address, and the
> > mails get stuck in the relay's spool directory with a "hostname lookup
> > failure" from the hub.
> > The multihomed server is also using split-horizon dns for routable
> > external and non-routable internal domain addresses; could it be that
> > that's the cause of the problem?

>
> To me that is a likely cause of errors. How would the relay know that
> these users are internal recipients?
>


Could have been the case. I stopped natting outbounds through the principal
interface and the symptom has improved from 'chronic' to 'endemic', instead
of all failing and I having to retouch q-files, now they fail only
sometimes, and the spool clears by itself when I reset sendmail. I suspect
if I upgrade to the latest version and arp patch the problem could go away
altogether.

But 3.5's round the corner. I better report my 3.4 SCSI 'symptoms' B4 end
of March.

MK

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-16-2008, 05:22 AM
mkhomo
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Sendmail Masquerading on Multihomed mail Relay

mkhomo wrote:

> erik wrote:
>
> > MK wrote:
> >
> > > Hi folks,
> > > I hope this one is easy for any one of you, its got me stumped.
> > > I've been collapsing most of my DMZ into a multihomed server.
> > > I still have separate servers for mail relay and mail hub, but I am
> > > finding that for mail originating internally, and destined to another
> > > internal recipient with a generic email address, the relay sendmail is
> > > not translating the generic emails into the hub email address, and the
> > > mails get stuck in the relay's spool directory with a "hostname lookup
> > > failure" from the hub.
> > > The multihomed server is also using split-horizon dns for routable
> > > external and non-routable internal domain addresses; could it be that
> > > that's the cause of the problem?

> >
> > To me that is a likely cause of errors. How would the relay know that
> > these users are internal recipients?
> >

>
> Could have been the case. I stopped natting outbounds through the principal
> interface and the symptom has improved from 'chronic' to 'endemic', instead
> of all failing and I having to retouch q-files, now they fail only
> sometimes, and the spool clears by itself when I reset sendmail. I suspect
> if I upgrade to the latest version and arp patch the problem could go away
> altogether.
>


I take back this arp theory (see my arp warnings thread). But my jury is still
out on my concurrence with eric, it'll take some time to verify the apparent
work-around. Moreover my ng spammers are awfully quiet; makes me nervous...
Where are you guys? Work with me

>
> But 3.5's round the corner. I better report my 3.4 SCSI 'symptoms' B4 end
> of March.


I better get on with this. The Onstream SCSI tape behaves much better in
386/3.4 than 386/3.3, but still generates errors.

>
>
> MK


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-16-2008, 05:22 AM
mkhomo
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Sendmail Masquerading on Multihomed mail Relay

mkhomo wrote:

> ...Moreover my ng spammers are awfully quiet; makes me nervous...
> Where are you guys? Work with me
>


Only 13 new spam sources from this whole wild web?
I wanna buy all your stuff(s) Come on agents, (as he palm flaps a menacing
invitation).

Sell me your enlargers, invigorators, herbs & spices, medicines, lotto numbers,
....I want to buy it all, Now!

MK
PS Sorry folks this is a live test.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-16-2008, 05:23 AM
erik
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Sendmail Masquerading on Multihomed mail Relay

mkhomo wrote:

> mkhomo wrote:
>
>> ...Moreover my ng spammers are awfully quiet; makes me nervous...
>> Where are you guys? Work with me
>>

>
> Only 13 new spam sources from this whole wild web?
> I wanna buy all your stuff(s) Come on agents, (as he palm flaps a
> menacing invitation).
>
> Sell me your enlargers, invigorators, herbs & spices, medicines,
> lotto numbers, ...I want to buy it all, Now!
>
> MK
> PS Sorry folks this is a live test.


I have some 3100 spammails on stock for feeding spamassassin.
Interested? :-)

EJ
--
Remove the obvious part (including the dot) for my email address.
http://www.vanwesten.net for examples of ipf and pf.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-16-2008, 05:23 AM
mkhomo
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Sendmail Masquerading on Multihomed mail Relay

erik wrote:
....

> I have some 3100 spammails on stock for feeding spamassassin.
> Interested? :-)
>
> EJ


Guess Not.
More interesting from fresh open relays and 'mules', but I already have
8700 private access entries and counting....

Turning back to the subject, I'm finding all sorts of failed wiring
(which may have started my 'arp' symptoms). I wish I knew the lifespan
of twisted pair or of its corrosion of contacts. I have wiring that's a
good 10yrs in service, and am finding new surprises every day as I
restructure the network.

MK

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
UnixAdminTalk.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860