This is a discussion on slight strangeness in pf tables under 3.4 within the comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.misc forums, part of the OpenBSD category; --> I'm proably doing this in a backward way, but I'm using table <not_local> {$not_int_addr, $not_net_addr, $not_routed_addr, 0.0.0.0/1, 128.0.0.0/1} becase ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| I'm proably doing this in a backward way, but I'm using table <not_local> {$not_int_addr, $not_net_addr, $not_routed_addr, 0.0.0.0/1, 128.0.0.0/1} becase 0.0.0.0/0 wouldn't work. Have I missed something obvious? -- Justin Murdock |
| |||
| Justins local account wrote: > I'm proably doing this in a backward way, but I'm using > > table <not_local> {$not_int_addr, $not_net_addr, > $not_routed_addr, 0.0.0.0/1, 128.0.0.0/1} > > becase 0.0.0.0/0 wouldn't work. Have I missed something obvious? http://www.deadly.org/article.php3?sid=20040128121601 |
| ||||
| marc <earxtacy@dixinet.com> writes: > http://www.deadly.org/article.php3?sid=20040128121601 I'm stable # head -n 1 /usr/src/sbin/pfctl/pfctl_parser.c /* $OpenBSD: pfctl_parser.c,v 1.174 2003/08/22 21:52:11 itojun Exp $ */ -- Justin Murdock |