Unix Technical Forum

Re: Dual-core and Dual Dual-core servers.

This is a discussion on Re: Dual-core and Dual Dual-core servers. within the lucky.openbsd.misc forums, part of the OpenBSD category; --> On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 01:39:51AM -0400, e.stewart@mac.com wrote: > I am pricing out two servers right now. ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > OpenBSD > lucky.openbsd.misc

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2008, 07:26 AM
Joachim Schipper
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Dual-core and Dual Dual-core servers.

On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 01:39:51AM -0400, e.stewart@mac.com wrote:
> I am pricing out two servers right now.
>
> One server will be an Apache/PHP web server. The other will be a
> MySQL database server.
>
> I plan to install OpenBSD 3.9-stable and PHP and MySQL packages.
>
> These server will be Dell PowerEdge 1950.
>
> Each will have a Dual Core Xeon 5060 (3.20Ghz with 1066Mhz FSB).
>
> Knowing the setups I'm gonna be using (the one's mentioned above),
> and I gonna get much performance increase by adding a second
> processor (the same type of course) to these server?
>
> Is OpenBSD and Apache/PHP gonna take advantage of a second processor
> and show some decent increase in performance or am I throwing money
> away on the second processor?


A second processor might be a good investment here. Of course, two
servers is also worth considering, as such a setup is likely to be, at
least, more robust in the face of hardware failures. (It's also more
complex...)

> Same for OpenBSD and MySQL. Am I gonna be throwing money away by
> purchasing a second processor for it?


Possibly, yes. MySQL is threaded, and the OpenBSD threads implementation
isn't the fastest possible (it's all in userland, so there's only one
kernel-level process/thread).

If using a better database (PostgreSQL comes to mind) is not an option,
you might want to consider using another system - like FreeBSD - for
this; MySQL performance isn't terribly good, even on a uniprocessor
system, anyway.

This does, of course, not mean that it is unusable by any means; many
people run MySQL on OpenBSD and are quite happy with performance,
stability, and so on. Me, I dislike MySQL for other reasons.

> Lastly, default server will be coming with 1 GB of RAM. I plan to
> upgrade both servers to 4 GB of RAM each? Is this worth spending the
> money or am I wasting it here as well?


Note you'll need a recent version to use > 2 GB RAM on i386.

> I don't mind spending the money on extra RAM and processors if the
> server setups I'm planning on using will take advantage of it. I'm
> too new to OpenBSD to know if I would wise in the extra spending or not.


Joachim

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com