Unix Technical Forum

Re: ksh vs bash

This is a discussion on Re: ksh vs bash within the lucky.openbsd.misc forums, part of the OpenBSD category; --> >>>>> "Woodchuck" == Woodchuck <djv@bedford.net> writes: Woodchuck> Perl has obviated the need for some sort of interactive interpreted Woodchuck> ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > OpenBSD > lucky.openbsd.misc

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2008, 07:26 AM
Randal L. Schwartz
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: ksh vs bash

>>>>> "Woodchuck" == Woodchuck <djv@bedford.net> writes:

Woodchuck> Perl has obviated the need for some sort of interactive interpreted
Woodchuck> system language. Bash has some new and expanded features, but not
Woodchuck> enough to make its use compelling.

Since discovering Perl, the longest thing I ever write in any shell
script is .profile, and that's annoying enough, and making me wish
I could just cut the cord and use Perl as my login shell.

--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com