vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 06:07:53PM +0200, knitti wrote: > On 8/7/06, Jens Mayer <mail@jensmayer.de> wrote: > >While the networking part can be handled by carp, I'm collecting ideas on > >how > >to keep the local file systems in synch - especially for ftp users and the > >mailinglist archives. The synchronization will be done via a dedicated > >cross > >coonect cable directly between the boxes. > > while I would do it with rsync (I know, depends on what you want to do), > I don't see any reason why ccd'ing two large nfs-exposed files shouldn't > work. But I think this would be more ugly and complicated than rsyncing > every x minutes... Also, I'm not sure how ccd and nfs interact, but given that ccd isn't meant for data security (use RAIDframe) and nfs has many interesting issues, I'm not certain I would trust my data to that. I *believe* that, presuming the NFS server itself will not fail and such, that RAIDframe over NFS *may* work. I'm no developer or even too good at filesystems, though, and I would recommend a lot of testing. Joachim |