Re: OpenBSD and high availability
This is a discussion on Re: OpenBSD and high availability within the lucky.openbsd.misc forums, part of the OpenBSD category; --> On Aug 7, 2006, at 12:31 PM, Joachim Schipper wrote: > On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 06:07:53PM +0200, ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
02-18-2008, 07:07 AM
| ||||
| ||||
 Re: OpenBSD and high availability On Aug 7, 2006, at 12:31 PM, Joachim Schipper wrote: > On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 06:07:53PM +0200, knitti wrote: >> On 8/7/06, Jens Mayer <mail@jensmayer.de> wrote: >>> While the networking part can be handled by carp, I'm collecting >>> ideas on >>> how >>> to keep the local file systems in synch - especially for ftp >>> users and the >>> mailinglist archives. The synchronization will be done via a >>> dedicated >>> cross >>> coonect cable directly between the boxes. >> >> while I would do it with rsync (I know, depends on what you want >> to do), >> I don't see any reason why ccd'ing two large nfs-exposed files >> shouldn't >> work. But I think this would be more ugly and complicated than >> rsyncing >> every x minutes... > > Also, I'm not sure how ccd and nfs interact, but given that ccd isn't > meant for data security (use RAIDframe) and nfs has many interesting > issues, I'm not certain I would trust my data to that. > > I *believe* that, presuming the NFS server itself will not fail and > such, that RAIDframe over NFS *may* work. I'm no developer or even too > good at filesystems, though, and I would recommend a lot of testing. If it's good enough for tedu@... http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=open...6187916316&w=2 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=open...8689405500&w=2 -- Jason Dixon DixonGroup Consulting http://www.dixongroup.net      |
Linear Mode
