Re: watchdogd
This is a discussion on Re: watchdogd within the lucky.openbsd.misc forums, part of the OpenBSD category; --> On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 01:42:17PM +0200, Rogier Krieger wrote: > On 8/5/06, Felix Kronlage <fkr@hazardous.org> wrote: > ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
02-18-2008, 07:06 AM
| ||||
| ||||
 Re: watchdogd On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 01:42:17PM +0200, Rogier Krieger wrote: > On 8/5/06, Felix Kronlage <fkr@hazardous.org> wrote: > >I think, silent by default with -v for more informations seems more > >appropiate too. > > Would you care to elaborate why you want the default behaviour (notify > on a changed timeout) altered? > > The proposed patch by the OP doesn't cause changes for existing users. > Your suggestion does. Are there that many noisy devices? I'm just > curious. > > Cheers, > > Rogier > > -- > If you don't know where you're going, any road will get you there. > > My 2 eurocent: http://catb.org/~esr/writings/taoup/...html#id2878450 If the anchor doesn't work, it's the "Rule of Silence" Tobias      |
 |
« Re: sendmail with milter support by default?
|
Re: radioctl error on i386 Aug 1 snapshot; Inappropriate ioctl for device »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:30 PM.
