SEO
vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
02-22-2008, 11:21 AM
| ||||
| ||||
 Re: arp: replacing existing entries It makes absoutely no difference. You're freaking out over nothing. Why don't you guys go try to find some real bugs? > Quoting Mike Belopuhov (mkb@cvs.hnet.spb.ru): > > I suppose, it is not a new topic for a discussion, anyway, > > here is the diff. > > usage() should be marked __dead (not that it seemed to make any > difference in the resulting binary): > > Index: arp.c > ================================================== ================= > RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/arp/arp.c,v > retrieving revision 1.31 > diff -u -r1.31 arp.c > --- arp.c 2005/01/04 10:57:23 1.31 > +++ arp.c 2005/03/25 00:33:57 > @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ > void getsocket(void); > int rtmsg(int); > int set(int, char **); > -void usage(void); > +__dead void usage(void);      |
Linear Mode
