vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Several people have mentioned knowing of "other CVS projects" and even specifically mentioning CVSNT. If these people are working on OpenCVS (and from some comments I suspect they are) then I assume there is not enough synergy from the OpenCVS POV to put any further effort in to the discussion from my end. >I don't sense any chance of that happening. Over here, there are about >23,000 lines of code already that argue against that. Unless you wanted >to adopt and start using this as the basis for your code. I'd not it out. I can see the OpenCVS project has been quite active, and so has the CVSNT project. Any attempt to combine effort would therefore have to involve no longer contributing effort someplace else - but provided that the payoff was good enough people on both teams would see the bigger picture. >That said, we have no interest in furthering GPL codebases. Not just >because of the licenses, but also because of the obvious bloat that >always happens with these codebases designed to "work on every stupid >variation of system even written in the past". That is a bigger stumbling block from my POV - for at least the next few years supporting Mac OS X, RH Linux, Solaris, HPUX and Windows is core to CVSNT. Again thanks everyone for your time and replies. Regards, Arthur |