This is a discussion on Re: [Patch:] restore the native use of isdigit() instead of ap_isdigit() in httpd. within the lucky.openbsd.tech forums, part of the OpenBSD category; --> On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 03:20:44PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote: > OK, that's fair. So, if I understand ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 03:20:44PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote: > OK, that's fair. So, if I understand you right then, I will redo the > changes and anywhere that is might not be already (unsigned char), you > would suggest that I called it like this for example then and the > results would be the same as it is now using the ap_isdigit() one. Exactly. It might help you to remove the explicit cast in ctype.h for testing, GCC should warn about char used as index. Joerg |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|