Unix Technical Forum

Re: pf synproxy and tags

This is a discussion on Re: pf synproxy and tags within the lucky.openbsd.tech forums, part of the OpenBSD category; --> Daniel Hartmeier wrote: > But maybe using two parameters is simpler, I'm not sure. There are three > cases ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > OpenBSD > lucky.openbsd.tech

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-22-2008, 11:26 AM
j knight
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: pf synproxy and tags

Daniel Hartmeier wrote:

> But maybe using two parameters is simpler, I'm not sure. There are three
> cases (add state tag, add no-refiltering tag, add no tag), so it would
> need two special values (not just 0), might be too ugly.


To do this you'd have to reserve a tag id in pf_ioctl.c:tagname2tag().
This would also affect queue ids and I don't know if that could affect
some altq code somewhere (such as altq somewhere depending on queue ids
starting at 1, when we start at 2 and use 1 as the reserved value).

Any thoughts?



..joel

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com