vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Hello, how can I setup a new virtual interface with an ip-address in the same segment? Linux can do that by creating an "eth0:1" interface I would like to setup a ftp-server, and the ip of this server should not be the same as the ip of local adapter thanks uwe |
| |||
| Martin Etteldorf wrote: > Uwe <uwe.ortner@avcraft.de> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> how can I setup a new virtual interface with an ip-address in the same >> segment? > > man ifconfig > > > Martin. ifconfig ent0:1 inet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx up doesnt work on AIX! Uwe |
| |||
| Uwe wrote: > Martin Etteldorf wrote: > > >>Uwe <uwe.ortner@avcraft.de> wrote: >> >>>Hello, >>> >>>how can I setup a new virtual interface with an ip-address in the same >>>segment? >> >>man ifconfig >> >> >>Martin. > > > ifconfig ent0:1 inet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx up > > doesnt work on AIX! > > Uwe Did u actually read the manpage on AIX as suggested? If so, read it again. Particularly the description of the "interface" parameter and the "alias" parameter? |
| |||
| Uwe <uwe.ortner@classic-net.de> wrote in message news:<booosb$1evt51$1@ID-26745.news.uni-berlin.de>... > Martin Etteldorf wrote: > > > Uwe <uwe.ortner@avcraft.de> wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> how can I setup a new virtual interface with an ip-address in the same > >> segment? > > > > man ifconfig > > > > > > Martin. > > ifconfig ent0:1 inet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx up > ifconfig en0 inet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx alias works though. Steve |
| ||||
| Steve Nottingham wrote: > Uwe <uwe.ortner@classic-net.de> wrote in message > news:<booosb$1evt51$1@ID-26745.news.uni-berlin.de>... >> Martin Etteldorf wrote: >> >> > Uwe <uwe.ortner@avcraft.de> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> >> >> how can I setup a new virtual interface with an ip-address in the same >> >> segment? >> > >> > man ifconfig >> > >> > >> > Martin. >> >> ifconfig ent0:1 inet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx up >> > ifconfig en0 inet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx alias > > works though. > > Steve oops, thanks you are right ... |