This is a discussion on hardware failure on VIO server within the AIX Operating System forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> I have a p570 server (8 way) running 2 VIO servers which provide resources to 20 virtual servers. What ...
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| |||
| Mag wrote: > I have a p570 server (8 way) running 2 VIO servers which provide > resources to 20 virtual servers. What will happen if I have a memory > chip failure or CPU failure, even though I have 2 VIO servers? > > > Thanks! > Depends on where your memory failure is. Your memory is assigned directly to each LPAR. The LPAR that owns the bad chip is going to see the hit. Dual VIO servers will not help you in this aspect, unless the bad chip is in one of the VIO servers. If your 2 vio's are built properly, one can continue serving resources while the other is down. There is enough error checking built into IBM's hardware to detect these types of failures preemptively. Nothing is 100%, though! :-) |
| |||
| >> I have a p570 server (8 way) running 2 VIO servers which provide >> resources to 20 virtual servers. What will happen if I have a memory >> chip failure or CPU failure, even though I have 2 VIO servers? Good point to start is answer to the question, why do we do two VIO servers. Answer might be to make it redundant in case of failure, this kind of reasoning is based on hardware habit which says that better have two then one then you are safer. In my opinion it doesn't apply to VIO Server. For double configuration: In my humble opinion the only good reason to have two VIO servers is to enable concurrent maintenance change of configuration and restart of your VIO server configuration. In certain cases it is convenient to make changes on the first IO Server restart it, then image change on other and then restart second, that way you do not lose constant access to data. There is little more chance that you will survive hardware or software failure (but just a little) False feeling that we have everything doubled and we secured Against double configuration: Second VIO consumes resources of your server, people say that VIO should have at least 0.5 of procesor that loss of at least 1000$ worth processor power. More software, more possible software failures (hardware or software failure ) Configuration is much more complex and error prone Only way to be fairly secure is to make failover cluster between two boxes. Below that you have SPOF and you have to live with it. Regards Stan |
| ||||
| It all depends how you have your resources allocated. If you're running dual VIO servers and all CPU and memory is set to shared, then you shouldn't really suffer assuming a clean failure. However, if you have dedicated CPUs and memory going to your VIO servers, then you will have a problem. I can't really think of a reason why you WOULD have dedicated CPUs (as opposed to shared) going to your VIOs. On May 28, 4:21 pm, Mag <magaw...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have a p570 server (8 way) running 2 VIO servers which provide > resources to 20 virtual servers. What will happen if I have a memory > chip failure or CPU failure, even though I have 2 VIO servers? > > Thanks! |