This is a discussion on I like wabbits! within the AIX Operating System forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> :nelohT >Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> writes: > >> :nelohT > >Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? > >>> Daniel Kolle ...
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| :nelohT >Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> writes: > >> :nelohT > >Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? > >>> Daniel Kolle <Daniel.Kolle@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> Cypherpunk@nyc.rr.com wrote: > >>>>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen? > >>>> Tholz is incapable of liking anything, Cypherpunk. > >>> Who is "Tholz", Kolle? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that >>> alias. > >> Classic erroneous presupposition. > >Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Non sequitur. -- "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic] should be your concern, Deco." -- David Tholen |
| |||
| Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> writes: > :nelohT Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? >>> :nelohT >> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? Note: no response. >>>>> :nelohT >>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? >> Note: no response. Note: still no response. >>>>>> Daniel Kolle <Daniel.Kolle@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> Cypherpunk@nyc.rr.com wrote: >>>>>>>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen? >>>>>>> Tholz is incapable of liking anything, Cypherpunk. >>>>>> Who is "Tholz", Kolle? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that >>>>>> alias. >>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. >>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. >>> Non sequitur. >> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > Illogical. Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. |
| |||
| Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> writes: > :nelohT Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? >>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: >>>>>> :nelohT >>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? >>>>>>> Cla >>>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen? >>>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, Deco? >>>>>> Nothing came through. >>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. >>>> I can verify. >>> He can verify. >> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > Standard Tholen baby blanket, #3. Classic erroneous presupposition. |
| |||
| Art Deco wrote: > ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote: >>Art Deco wrote: >>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>Art Deco wrote: >>>>> :nelohT >>>>> >>>>>>Daniel Kolle <Daniel.Kolle@gmail.com> writes: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Cypherpunk@nyc.rr.com wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen? >>>>>> >>>>>>> Tholz is incapable of liking anything, Cypherpunk. >>>>>> >>>>>>Who is "Tholz", Kolle? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that >>>>>>alias. >>>>> >>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. >>>> >>>>How ironic. >>> >>> Classic pontification. >> >>On your part. > > Classic lack of specificity. No surprise there, really. -- ah |
| |||
| tholen@antispam.ham wrote: > Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> writes: > >> :nelohT > > Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? > >>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: > >>>>>>> :nelohT > >>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? > >>>>>>>> Cla > >>>>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen? > >>>>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, Deco? > >>>>>>> Nothing came through. > >>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > >>>>> I can verify. > >>>> He can verify. > >>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > >> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #3. > > Classic erroneous presupposition. Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. -- ah |
| |||
| tholen@antispam.ham wrote: > ah <splifingate@gmail.com> writes: > >>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: > >>>> :nelohT > >>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? > >>>>> Cla > >>>> Posting problems again, Tholen? > >>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, Deco? > >>>> Nothing came through. > >>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > >> I can verify. > > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Classic hallucination on your part, nelohT. -- ah |
| |||
| ah <splifingate@gmail.com> writes: >> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: >>> :nelohT >> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? >>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: >>>>>>>> :nelohT >>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? >>>>>>>>> Cla >>>>>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen? >>>>>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, Deco? >>>>>>>> Nothing came through. >>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. >>>>>> I can verify. >>>>> He can verify. >>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. >>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #3. >> Classic erroneous presupposition. > Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. Classic erroneous presupposition. |
| |||
| ah <splifingate@gmail.com> writes: >>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: >>>>> :nelohT >>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? >>>>>> Cla >>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen? >>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, Deco? >>>>> Nothing came through. >>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. >>> I can verify. >> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > Classic hallucination on your part, nelohT. Who is "nelohT", ah? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias. |
| |||
| tholen@antispam.ham wrote: > ah <splifingate@gmail.com> writes: > >>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: > >>>> :nelohT > >>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? > >>>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> :nelohT > >>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? > >>>>>>>>>> Cla > >>>>>>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen? > >>>>>>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, Deco? > >>>>>>>>> Nothing came through. > >>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > >>>>>>> I can verify. > >>>>>> He can verify. > >>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > >>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #3. > >>> Classic erroneous presupposition. > >> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. > > Classic erroneous presupposition. Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. -- ah |
| ||||
| ah <splifingate@gmail.com> writes: >>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: >>>>> :nelohT >>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? >>>>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> :nelohT >>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? >>>>>>>>>>> Cla >>>>>>>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen? >>>>>>>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, Deco? >>>>>>>>>> Nothing came through. >>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. >>>>>>>> I can verify. >>>>>>> He can verify. >>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. >>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #3. >>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. >>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. >> Classic erroneous presupposition. > Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. Classic erroneous presupposition. |