This is a discussion on I like wabbits! within the AIX Operating System forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> tholen@antispam.ham wrote: > ah <splifingate@gmail.com> writes: > >>>>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> :nelohT > >>>>>>>>> Still suffering ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| tholen@antispam.ham wrote: > ah <splifingate@gmail.com> writes: > >>>>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> :nelohT > >>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? > >>>>>>>>>>> Cla > >>>>>>>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen? > >>>>>>>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, Deco? > >>>>>>>>>> Nothing came through. > >>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > >>>>>>>> I can verify. > >>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > >>>>>> Classic hallucination on your part, nelohT. > >>>>> Who is "nelohT", ah? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that >>>>> alias. > >>>> Note: no response. > >>> I'm well aware that you didn't answer the question, ah. No need to >>> tell me about it. > >> Note: still no response. > > I'm well aware that you still didn't answer the question, ah. No need > to tell me about it. Note: still no response. -- ah |
| |||
| ah <splifingate@gmail.com> writes: >>>>>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> :nelohT >>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? >>>>>>>>>>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :nelohT >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cla >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, Deco? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing came through. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can verify. >>>>>>>>>>>>> He can verify. >>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. >>>>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #3. >>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. >>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. >>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. >>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. >>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. >>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. >>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. >>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. >> Classic erroneous presupposition. > Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. Classic erroneous presupposition. |
| |||
| ah <splifingate@gmail.com> writes: >>>>>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> :nelohT >>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? >>>>>>>>>>>> Cla >>>>>>>>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen? >>>>>>>>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, Deco? >>>>>>>>>>> Nothing came through. >>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. >>>>>>>>> I can verify. >>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. >>>>>>> Classic hallucination on your part, nelohT. >>>>>> Who is "nelohT", ah? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that >>>>>> alias. >>>>> Note: no response. >>>> I'm well aware that you didn't answer the question, ah. No need to >>>> tell me about it. >>> Note: still no response. >> I'm well aware that you still didn't answer the question, ah. No need >> to tell me about it. > Note: still no response. I'm well aware that you still didn't answer the question, ah. No need to tell me about it. |
| |||
| Dr. Robotnik wrote: > ah <splifingate@gmail.com> writes: > >>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> :nelohT > >>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :nelohT > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cla > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, Deco? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing came through. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can verify. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> He can verify. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > >>>>>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #3. > >>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. > >>>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. > >>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. > >>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. > >>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. > >>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. > >>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. > >>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. > >>> Classic erroneous presupposition. > >> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. > > Classic erroneous presupposition. Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. btw, congratulations Doctor. -- ah |
| |||
| tholen@antispam.ham wrote: > ah <splifingate@gmail.com> writes: > >>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> :nelohT > >>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cla > >>>>>>>>>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen? > >>>>>>>>>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, Deco? > >>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing came through. > >>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > >>>>>>>>>> I can verify. > >>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > >>>>>>>> Classic hallucination on your part, nelohT. > >>>>>>> Who is "nelohT", ah? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that >>>>>>> alias. > >>>>>> Note: no response. > >>>>> I'm well aware that you didn't answer the question, ah. No need to >>>>> tell me about it. > >>>> Note: still no response. > >>> I'm well aware that you still didn't answer the question, ah. No need >>> to tell me about it. > >> Note: still no response. > > I'm well aware that you still didn't answer the question, ah. No need > to tell me about it. Note: still no response. -- ah |
| |||
| ah <splifingate@gmail.com> writes: > Dr. Robotnik wrote: Suffering from attribution problems, ah? >>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> :nelohT >>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :nelohT >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cla >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, Deco? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing came through. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can verify. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He can verify. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #3. >>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. >>>>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. >>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. >>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. >>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. >>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. >>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. >>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. >>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. >>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. >> Classic erroneous presupposition. > Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. Classic erroneous presupposition. > btw, congratulations Doctor. Who is "Doctor", ah? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias. |
| |||
| ah <splifingate@gmail.com> writes: >>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> :nelohT >>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cla >>>>>>>>>>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen? >>>>>>>>>>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, Deco? >>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing came through. >>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. >>>>>>>>>>> I can verify. >>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. >>>>>>>>> Classic hallucination on your part, nelohT. >>>>>>>> Who is "nelohT", ah? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that >>>>>>>> alias. >>>>>>> Note: no response. >>>>>> I'm well aware that you didn't answer the question, ah. No need to >>>>>> tell me about it. >>>>> Note: still no response. >>>> I'm well aware that you still didn't answer the question, ah. No need >>>> to tell me about it. >>> Note: still no response. >> I'm well aware that you still didn't answer the question, ah. No need >> to tell me about it. > Note: still no response. I'm well aware that you still didn't answer the question, ah. No need to tell me about it. |
| |||
| ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote: >Art Deco wrote: >> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote: >>>Art Deco wrote: >>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>Art Deco wrote: >>>>>> :nelohT >>>>>> >>>>>>>Daniel Kolle <Daniel.Kolle@gmail.com> writes: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cypherpunk@nyc.rr.com wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Tholz is incapable of liking anything, Cypherpunk. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Who is "Tholz", Kolle? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that >>>>>>>alias. >>>>>> >>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. >>>>> >>>>>How ironic. >>>> >>>> Classic pontification. >>> >>>On your part. >> >> Classic lack of specificity. > >No surprise there, really. Non sequitur. -- "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic] should be your concern, Deco." -- David Tholen |
| |||
| On Sun, 11 May 2008 21:04:10 -0600, Art Deco <erfc-1024@usa.net> wrote: >ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote: >>Art Deco wrote: >>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>Art Deco wrote: >>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>Art Deco wrote: >>>>>>> :nelohT >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Daniel Kolle <Daniel.Kolle@gmail.com> writes: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cypherpunk@nyc.rr.com wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Tholz is incapable of liking anything, Cypherpunk. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Who is "Tholz", Kolle? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that >>>>>>>>alias. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. >>>>>> >>>>>>How ironic. >>>>> >>>>> Classic pontification. >>>> >>>>On your part. >>> >>> Classic lack of specificity. >> >>No surprise there, really. > >Non sequitur. Shut the fuck up, Dicko, youz asshole. |
| ||||
| On Sun, 11 May 2008 21:26:36 -0600, Art Deco <erfc-1024@usa.net> wrote: >:nelohT > >>Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> writes: >> >>> :nelohT >> >>Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? > >Still beating your wive, Tholen? What's a "wive", Dicko? Still beating your meat? |