SEO
vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
05-12-2008, 09:07 AM
| ||||
| ||||
 Re: I like wabbits! :nelohT >ah <splifingate@gmail.com> writes: > >> Dr. Robotnik wrote: > >Suffering from attribution problems, ah? > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> :nelohT > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :nelohT > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cla > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, >Deco? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing came through. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can verify. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He can verify. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #3. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. > >>>>>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. > >>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. > >>>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. > >>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. > >>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. > >>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. > >>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. > >>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. > >>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. > >>> Classic erroneous presupposition. > >> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. > >Classic erroneous presupposition. > >> btw, congratulations Doctor. > >Who is "Doctor", ah? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that >alias. That's five examples in a row where you've run away from the attributions, Tholen. -- "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic] should be your concern, Deco." -- David Tholen      |
|
05-12-2008, 09:07 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: I like wabbits! :nelohT >ah <splifingate@gmail.com> writes: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> :nelohT > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cla > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen? > >>>>>>>>>>>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, Deco? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing came through. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > >>>>>>>>>>>> I can verify. > >>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > >>>>>>>>>> Classic hallucination on your part, nelohT. > >>>>>>>>> Who is "nelohT", ah? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that >>>>>>>>> alias. > >>>>>>>> Note: no response. > >>>>>>> I'm well aware that you didn't answer the question, ah. No need to >>>>>>> tell me about it. > >>>>>> Note: still no response. > >>>>> I'm well aware that you still didn't answer the question, ah. No need >>>>> to tell me about it. > >>>> Note: still no response. > >>> I'm well aware that you still didn't answer the question, ah. No need >>> to tell me about it. > >> Note: still no response. > >I'm well aware that you still didn't answer the question, ah. No need >to tell me about it. Six times for this one. -- "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic] should be your concern, Deco." -- David Tholen |
|
05-12-2008, 09:07 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: I like wabbits! :nelohT >Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> writes: > >> :nelohT > >Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? Still beating your wive, Tholen? > >>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: > >>>>>>> :nelohT > >>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? > >>>>>>>> Cla > >>>>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen? > >>>>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, Deco? > >>>>>>> Nothing came through. > >>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > >>>>> I can verify. > >>>> He can verify. > >>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > >> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #3. > >Classic erroneous presupposition. Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. -- "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic] should be your concern, Deco." -- David Tholen |
|
05-12-2008, 09:07 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: I like wabbits! Art Deco <erfc-1024@usa.net> writes: > :nelohT Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? >> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Dr. Robotnik wrote: >> Suffering from attribution problems, ah? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :nelohT >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :nelohT >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cla >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, Deco? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing came through. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can verify. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He can verify. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #3. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. >>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. >>>>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. >>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. >>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. >>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. >>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. >>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. >>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. >>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. >>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. >> Classic erroneous presupposition. >>> btw, congratulations Doctor. >> Who is "Doctor", ah? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that >> alias. > That's five examples in a row where you've run away from the > attributions, Tholen. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > -- > "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic] > should be your concern, Deco." > -- David Tholen Classic kookery on your part, Deco: "Out-of-context quotes in your boilerplate spam, Davie, how kooky." --Art Deco |
|
05-12-2008, 09:07 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: I like wabbits! Art Deco <erfc-1024@usa.net> writes: > :nelohT Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? >> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :nelohT >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cla >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, Deco? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing came through. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. >>>>>>>>>>>>> I can verify. >>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. >>>>>>>>>>> Classic hallucination on your part, nelohT. >>>>>>>>>> Who is "nelohT", ah? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that >>>>>>>>>> alias. >>>>>>>>> Note: no response. >>>>>>>> I'm well aware that you didn't answer the question, ah. No need to >>>>>>>> tell me about it. >>>>>>> Note: still no response. >>>>>> I'm well aware that you still didn't answer the question, ah. No need >>>>>> to tell me about it. >>>>> Note: still no response. >>>> I'm well aware that you still didn't answer the question, ah. No need >>>> to tell me about it. >>> Note: still no response. >> I'm well aware that you still didn't answer the question, ah. No need >> to tell me about it. > Six times for this one. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > -- > "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic] > should be your concern, Deco." > -- David Tholen Classic kookery on your part, Deco: "Out-of-context quotes in your boilerplate spam, Davie, how kooky." --Art Deco |
|
05-12-2008, 09:07 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: I like wabbits! Art Deco <erfc-1024@usa.net> writes: > :nelohT Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? >>> :nelohT >> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? > Still beating your wive, Tholen? Classic erroneous presupposition. Classic grammatical error. I see that you didn't answer the question, Deco. No surprise there, really. >>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: >>>>>>>> :nelohT >>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? >>>>>>>>> Cla >>>>>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen? >>>>>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, Deco? >>>>>>>> Nothing came through. >>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. >>>>>> I can verify. >>>>> He can verify. >>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. >>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #3. >> Classic erroneous presupposition. > Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. Classic erroneous presupposition. > -- > "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic] > should be your concern, Deco." > -- David Tholen Classic kookery on your part, Deco: "Out-of-context quotes in your boilerplate spam, Davie, how kooky." --Art Deco |
|
05-16-2008, 01:32 PM
| |||
| |||
| Re: I like wabbits! tholen@antispam.ham wrote: > Art Deco <erfc-1024@usa.net> writes: > >> :nelohT > > Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? > >>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> Dr. Robotnik wrote: > >>> Suffering from attribution problems, ah? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :nelohT > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :nelohT > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cla > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, Deco? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing came through. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can verify. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He can verify. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #3. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. > >>>>>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. > >>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. > >>>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. > >>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. > >>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. > >>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. > >>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. > >>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. > >>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. > >>> Classic erroneous presupposition. > >>>> btw, congratulations Doctor. > >>> Who is "Doctor", ah? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that >>> alias. > >> That's five examples in a row where you've run away from the >> attributions, Tholen. > > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > >> -- >> "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic] >> should be your concern, Deco." >> -- David Tholen > > Classic kookery on your part, Deco: > > "Out-of-context quotes in your boilerplate spam, Davie, > how kooky." > --Art Deco > Standard Tholen baby blanket, #12. -- ah |
|
05-16-2008, 01:32 PM
| |||
| |||
| Re: I like wabbits! tholen@antispam.ham wrote: > ah <splifingate@gmail.com> writes: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> :nelohT > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cla > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen? > >>>>>>>>>>>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, Deco? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing came through. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > >>>>>>>>>>>> I can verify. > >>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > >>>>>>>>>> Classic hallucination on your part, nelohT. > >>>>>>>>> Who is "nelohT", ah? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that >>>>>>>>> alias. > >>>>>>>> Note: no response. > >>>>>>> I'm well aware that you didn't answer the question, ah. No need to >>>>>>> tell me about it. > >>>>>> Note: still no response. > >>>>> I'm well aware that you still didn't answer the question, ah. No need >>>>> to tell me about it. > >>>> Note: still no response. > >>> I'm well aware that you still didn't answer the question, ah. No need >>> to tell me about it. > >> Note: still no response. > > I'm well aware that you still didn't answer the question, ah. No need > to tell me about it. Note: still no response. -- ah |
|
05-18-2008, 09:56 PM
| |||
| |||
| Re: I like wabbits! ah <splifingate@gmail.com> writes: >> Art Deco <erfc-1024@usa.net> wrote: >>> :nelohT >> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? >>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Dr. Robotnik wrote: >>>> Suffering from attribution problems, ah? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :nelohT >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :nelohT >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cla >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, Deco? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing came through. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can verify. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He can verify. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #3. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. >>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. >>>>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. >>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. >>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. >>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. >>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. >>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. >>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. >>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. >>>>> btw, congratulations Doctor. >>>> Who is "Doctor", ah? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that >>>> alias. >>> That's five examples in a row where you've run away from the >>> attributions, Tholen. >> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. >>> -- >>> "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic] >>> should be your concern, Deco." >>> -- David Tholen >> Classic kookery on your part, Deco: >> >> "Out-of-context quotes in your boilerplate spam, Davie, >> how kooky." >> --Art Deco > Standard Tholen baby blanket, #12. Classic erroneous presupposition. |
|
05-18-2008, 09:56 PM
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: I like wabbits! ah <splifingate@gmail.com> writes: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :nelohT >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cla >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, Deco? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing came through. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. >>>>>>>>>>>>> I can verify. >>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. >>>>>>>>>>> Classic hallucination on your part, nelohT. >>>>>>>>>> Who is "nelohT", ah? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that >>>>>>>>>> alias. >>>>>>>>> Note: no response. >>>>>>>> I'm well aware that you didn't answer the question, ah. No need to >>>>>>>> tell me about it. >>>>>>> Note: still no response. >>>>>> I'm well aware that you still didn't answer the question, ah. No need >>>>>> to tell me about it. >>>>> Note: still no response. >>>> I'm well aware that you still didn't answer the question, ah. No need >>>> to tell me about it. >>> Note: still no response. >> I'm well aware that you still didn't answer the question, ah. No need >> to tell me about it. > Note: still no response. I'm well aware that you still didn't answer the question, ah. No need to tell me about it. |
Linear Mode
