I like wabbits!
This is a discussion on I like wabbits! within the AIX Operating System forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> :nelohT >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic >>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic >>>>>>>>>>> Classic >>>>>>>>> Classic >>>>>>> Classic >>>>> Classic >>> Classic ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
05-24-2008, 07:57 AM
| ||||
| ||||
 Re: I like wabbits! :nelohT >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic >>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic >>>>>>>>>>> Classic >>>>>>>>> Classic >>>>>>> Classic >>>>> Classic >>> Classic >Classic I do not believe you, Tholen. -- "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic] should be your concern, Deco." -- David Tholen      |
|
05-24-2008, 07:57 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: I like wabbits! :nelohT >ah <splifingate@gmail.com> writes: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :nelohT > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cla > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, >Deco? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing came through. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can verify. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > >>>>>>>>>>>> Classic hallucination on your part, nelohT. > >>>>>>>>>>> Who is "nelohT", ah? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that >>>>>>>>>>> alias. > >>>>>>>>>> Note: no response. > >>>>>>>>> I'm well aware that you didn't answer the question, ah. No need to >>>>>>>>> tell me about it. > >>>>>>>> Note: still no response. > >>>>>>> I'm well aware that you still didn't answer the question, ah. No need >>>>>>> to tell me about it. > >>>>>> Note: still no response. > >>>>> I'm well aware that you still didn't answer the question, ah. No need >>>>> to tell me about it. > >>>> Note: still no response. > >>> I'm well aware that you still didn't answer the question, ah. No need >>> to tell me about it. > >> Note: still no response. > >I'm well aware that you still didn't answer the question, ah. No need >to tell me about it. Note: still no response. -- "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic] should be your concern, Deco." -- David Tholen |
|
05-24-2008, 07:57 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: I like wabbits! Art Deco <erfc-1024@usa.net> writes: > :nelohT Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic >>>>>>>>>>>> Classic >>>>>>>>>> Classic >>>>>>>> Classic >>>>>> Classic >>>> Classic >> Classic > I do not believe you, Tholen. Non sequitur. > "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic] > should be your concern, Deco." > -- David Tholen Classic kookery on your part, Deco: "Out-of-context quotes in your boilerplate spam, Davie, how kooky." --Art Deco |
|
05-24-2008, 07:57 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: I like wabbits! Art Deco <erfc-1024@usa.net> writes: > :nelohT Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? >> Classic Classic >> Classic Classic > A bit light, but you can try harder next time, Tholen. Non sequitur. > "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic] > should be your concern, Deco." > -- David Tholen Classic kookery on your part, Deco: "Out-of-context quotes in your boilerplate spam, Davie, how kooky." --Art Deco |
|
05-24-2008, 07:57 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: I like wabbits! Art Deco <erfc-1024@usa.net> writes: > :nelohT Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? >> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> writes: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :nelohT >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cla >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, Deco? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing came through. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can verify. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic hallucination on your part, nelohT. >>>>>>>>>>>> Who is "nelohT", ah? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that >>>>>>>>>>>> alias. >>>>>>>>>>> Note: no response. >>>>>>>>>> I'm well aware that you didn't answer the question, ah. No need to >>>>>>>>>> tell me about it. >>>>>>>>> Note: still no response. >>>>>>>> I'm well aware that you still didn't answer the question, ah. No need >>>>>>>> to tell me about it. >>>>>>> Note: still no response. >>>>>> I'm well aware that you still didn't answer the question, ah. No need >>>>>> to tell me about it. >>>>> Note: still no response. >>>> I'm well aware that you still didn't answer the question, ah. No need >>>> to tell me about it. >>> Note: still no response. >> I'm well aware that you still didn't answer the question, ah. No need >> to tell me about it. > Note: still no response. I'm well aware that ah still didn't answer the question, Deco. No need to tell me about it. > "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic] > should be your concern, Deco." > -- David Tholen Classic kookery on your part, Deco: "Out-of-context quotes in your boilerplate spam, Davie, how kooky." --Art Deco |
|
05-24-2008, 07:57 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: I like wabbits! tholen@antispam.ham wrote: > ah <splifingate@gmail.com> writes: > >>> Art Deco <erfc-1024@usa.net> wrote: > >>>> :nelohT > >>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? > >>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> Dr. Robotnik wrote: > >>>>> Suffering from attribution problems, ah? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :nelohT > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :nelohT > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cla > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, Deco? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing came through. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can verify. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He can verify. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #3. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. > >>>>>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. > >>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. > >>>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. > >>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. > >>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. > >>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. > >>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. > >>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. > >>>>>> btw, congratulations Doctor. > >>>>> Who is "Doctor", ah? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that >>>>> alias. > >>>> That's five examples in a row where you've run away from the >>>> attributions, Tholen. > >>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > >>>> -- >>>> "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic] >>>> should be your concern, Deco." >>>> -- David Tholen > >>> Classic kookery on your part, Deco: >>> >>> "Out-of-context quotes in your boilerplate spam, Davie, >>> how kooky." >>> --Art Deco > >> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #12. > > Classic erroneous presupposition. On your part, Tholen. -- ah |
|
05-24-2008, 07:57 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: I like wabbits! tholen@antispam.ham wrote: > Art Deco <erfc-1024@usa.net> writes: > >> :nelohT > > Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic > >>>>>>>>>>> Classic > >>>>>>>>> Classic > >>>>>>> Classic > >>>>> Classic > >>> Classic > >> I do not believe you, Tholen. > > Non sequitur. > >> "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic] >> should be your concern, Deco." >> -- David Tholen > > Classic kookery on your part, Deco: > > "Out-of-context quotes in your boilerplate spam, Davie, > how kooky." > --Art Deco > Standard Tholen baby blanket, #12. -- ah |
|
05-24-2008, 07:57 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: I like wabbits! tholen@antispam.ham wrote: > Art Deco <erfc-1024@usa.net> writes: > >> :nelohT > > Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? > >>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> writes: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :nelohT > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cla > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, Deco? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing came through. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can verify. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic hallucination on your part, nelohT. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Who is "nelohT", ah? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that >>>>>>>>>>>>> alias. > >>>>>>>>>>>> Note: no response. > >>>>>>>>>>> I'm well aware that you didn't answer the question, ah. No need to >>>>>>>>>>> tell me about it. > >>>>>>>>>> Note: still no response. > >>>>>>>>> I'm well aware that you still didn't answer the question, ah. No need >>>>>>>>> to tell me about it. > >>>>>>>> Note: still no response. > >>>>>>> I'm well aware that you still didn't answer the question, ah. No need >>>>>>> to tell me about it. > >>>>>> Note: still no response. > >>>>> I'm well aware that you still didn't answer the question, ah. No need >>>>> to tell me about it. > >>>> Note: still no response. > >>> I'm well aware that you still didn't answer the question, ah. No need >>> to tell me about it. > >> Note: still no response. > > I'm well aware that ah still didn't answer the question, Deco. No need > to tell me about it. Note: still no response. > >> "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic] >> should be your concern, Deco." >> -- David Tholen > > Classic kookery on your part, Deco: > > "Out-of-context quotes in your boilerplate spam, Davie, > how kooky." > --Art Deco > Standard Tholen baby blanket, #12. -- ah |
|
05-24-2008, 07:57 AM
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: I like wabbits! ah <splifingate@gmail.com> writes: >>>> Art Deco <erfc-1024@usa.net> wrote: >>>>> :nelohT >>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? >>>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> Dr. Robotnik wrote: >>>>>> Suffering from attribution problems, ah? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :nelohT >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :nelohT >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cla >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, Deco? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing came through. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can verify. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He can verify. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #3. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. >>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. >>>>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. >>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. >>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. >>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. >>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. >>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. >>>>>>> btw, congratulations Doctor. >>>>>> Who is "Doctor", ah? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that >>>>>> alias. >>>>> That's five examples in a row where you've run away from the >>>>> attributions, Tholen. >>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. >>>>> -- >>>>> "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic] >>>>> should be your concern, Deco." >>>>> -- David Tholen >>>> Classic kookery on your part, Deco: >>>> >>>> "Out-of-context quotes in your boilerplate spam, Davie, >>>> how kooky." >>>> --Art Deco >>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #12. >> Classic erroneous presupposition. > On your part, Tholen. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. |
Linear Mode
