I like wabbits!
This is a discussion on I like wabbits! within the AIX Operating System forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> writes: >> Art Deco <erfc-1024@usa.net> wrote: >>> :nelohT >> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
05-24-2008, 07:57 AM
| ||||
| ||||
 Re: I like wabbits! ah <splifingate@gmail.com> writes: >> Art Deco <erfc-1024@usa.net> wrote: >>> :nelohT >> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic >>>>>>>>>>>> Classic >>>>>>>>>> Classic >>>>>>>> Classic >>>>>> Classic >>>> Classic >>> I do not believe you, Tholen. >> Non sequitur. >>> "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic] >>> should be your concern, Deco." >>> -- David Tholen >> Classic kookery on your part, Deco: >> >> "Out-of-context quotes in your boilerplate spam, Davie, >> how kooky." >> --Art Deco > Standard Tholen baby blanket, #12. Classic erroneous presupposition.      |
|
05-29-2008, 10:31 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: I like wabbits! :nelohT >ah <splifingate@gmail.com> writes: > >>> Art Deco <erfc-1024@usa.net> wrote: > >>>> :nelohT > >>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic > >>>>>>>>>>> Classic > >>>>>>>>> Classic > >>>>>>> Classic > >>>>> Classic > >>>> I do not believe you, Tholen. > >>> Non sequitur. > >>>> "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic] >>>> should be your concern, Deco." >>>> -- David Tholen > >>> Classic kookery on your part, Deco: >>> >>> "Out-of-context quotes in your boilerplate spam, Davie, >>> how kooky." >>> --Art Deco > >> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #12. > >Classic erroneous presupposition. Standard Tholen baby blanket, #1. -- "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic] should be your concern, Deco." -- David Tholen |
|
05-29-2008, 10:31 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: I like wabbits! :nelohT >ah <splifingate@gmail.com> writes: > >>>>> Art Deco <erfc-1024@usa.net> wrote: > >>>>>> :nelohT > >>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? > >>>>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>> Dr. Robotnik wrote: > >>>>>>> Suffering from attribution problems, ah? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :nelohT > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :nelohT > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cla > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What does your question have to do with college >basketball, Deco? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing came through. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can verify. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He can verify. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #3. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. > >>>>>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. > >>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. > >>>>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. > >>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. > >>>>>>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7. > >>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. > >>>>>>>> btw, congratulations Doctor. > >>>>>>> Who is "Doctor", ah? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that >>>>>>> alias. > >>>>>> That's five examples in a row where you've run away from the >>>>>> attributions, Tholen. > >>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > >>>>>> -- >>>>>> "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic] >>>>>> should be your concern, Deco." >>>>>> -- David Tholen > >>>>> Classic kookery on your part, Deco: >>>>> >>>>> "Out-of-context quotes in your boilerplate spam, Davie, >>>>> how kooky." >>>>> --Art Deco > >>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #12. > >>> Classic erroneous presupposition. > >> On your part, Tholen. > >Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Standard Tholen baby blanket, #3. -- "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic] should be your concern, Deco." -- David Tholen |
|
05-29-2008, 10:31 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: I like wabbits! Art Deco <erfc-1024@usa.net> writes: > :nelohT Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? >> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Art Deco <erfc-1024@usa.net> wrote: >>>>> :nelohT >>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic >>>>>>>>>>>> Classic >>>>>>>>>> Classic >>>>>>>> Classic >>>>>> Classic >>>>> I do not believe you, Tholen. >>>> Non sequitur. >>>>> "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic] >>>>> should be your concern, Deco." >>>>> -- David Tholen >>>> Classic kookery on your part, Deco: >>>> >>>> "Out-of-context quotes in your boilerplate spam, Davie, >>>> how kooky." >>>> --Art Deco >>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #12. >> Classic erroneous presupposition. > Standard Tholen baby blanket, #1. Classic erroneous presupposition. > "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic] > should be your concern, Deco." > -- David Tholen Classic kookery on your part, Deco: "Out-of-context quotes in your boilerplate spam, Davie, how kooky." --Art Deco |
|
05-29-2008, 10:31 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: I like wabbits! Art Deco <erfc-1024@usa.net> writes: > :nelohT Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? >> Still Non Classic > That depends on your definition of the word "classic", Tholen. Non sequitur. > "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic] > should be your concern, Deco." > -- David Tholen Classic kookery on your part, Deco: "Out-of-context quotes in your boilerplate spam, Davie, how kooky." --Art Deco |
|
05-29-2008, 10:31 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: I like wabbits! :nelohT > >>> Still Non Classic > >> That depends on your definition of the word "classic", Tholen. > >Non sequitur. Sequitur. -- "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic] should be your concern, Deco." -- David Tholen |
|
05-29-2008, 10:31 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: I like wabbits! Art Deco <erfc-1024@usa.net> writes: > :nelohT Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? >>>> Still Non Classic >>> That depends on your definition of the word "classic", Tholen. >> Non sequitur. > Sequitur. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic] > should be your concern, Deco." > -- David Tholen Classic kookery on your part, Deco: "Out-of-context quotes in your boilerplate spam, Davie, how kooky." --Art Deco |
|
05-29-2008, 10:31 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: I like wabbits! :nelohT >>>>> Still Non Classic > >>>> That depends on your definition of the word "classic", Tholen. > >>> Non sequitur. > >> Sequitur. > >Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Non sequitur. -- "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic] should be your concern, Deco." -- David Tholen |
|
05-29-2008, 10:31 AM
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: I like wabbits! "Art Deco" <erfc-1024@usa.net> wrote >>>>>> Still Non Classic >> >>>>> That depends on your definition of the word "classic", Tholen. >> >>>> Non sequitur. >> >>> Sequitur. >> >>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > > Non sequitur. What does that have to do with wabbits, Deco? --Tedward |
Linear Mode
