vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| I've installed a samba share on an aix box for the dba to test some backup stuff (doesn't have enough space on the intel box). I created the file as a JFS2, large file enabled, then also changed /etc/security/limits setting fsize=-1 for that user. Restarted samb and things look ok, however the file stops growing at 64GB. I know that's a limitation number, but with all I had done (above) I thought I was past this number. The file size is about 111 GB. Oh, creating the filesystem I maxed out NBPI and the next setting (put both parameters to the highest value). Am I missing something or is the 64GB a real hard limit? Mike |
| |||
| Mike wrote: > I've installed a samba share on an aix box for the dba > to test some backup stuff (doesn't have enough space > on the intel box). I created the file as a JFS2, large > file enabled, then also changed /etc/security/limits > setting fsize=-1 for that user. Restarted samb and things > look ok, however the file stops growing at 64GB. I know > that's a limitation number, but with all I had done (above) > I thought I was past this number. The file size is about > 111 GB. > > Oh, creating the filesystem I maxed out NBPI and the next > setting (put both parameters to the highest value). > > Am I missing something or is the 64GB a real hard limit? > > Mike Hi Mike, Are you sure this is jfs2? What does lsfs -q show you? There is no "large file enablement" for jfs2 as all jfs2 filesystems are large file enabled by default. Also with jfs2, the size of a file is limited to the size of the filesystem. I believe jfs2 is 6TB. Also with jfs2 there are no NBPI settings, only a block size (I doublechecked on my 5.1 and 5.2 servers just to be sure). To me it sounds like you still have a jfs filesystem set up, which explains the 64GB file limitation. ---Phil |
| |||
| On 2005-08-27, Phil Langerholc <root@localhost.nospam> wrote: > Mike wrote: >> I've installed a samba share on an aix box for the dba >> to test some backup stuff (doesn't have enough space >> on the intel box). I created the file as a JFS2, large >> file enabled, then also changed /etc/security/limits >> setting fsize=-1 for that user. Restarted samb and things >> look ok, however the file stops growing at 64GB. I know >> that's a limitation number, but with all I had done (above) >> I thought I was past this number. The file size is about >> 111 GB. >> >> Oh, creating the filesystem I maxed out NBPI and the next >> setting (put both parameters to the highest value). >> >> Am I missing something or is the 64GB a real hard limit? >> >> Mike > Hi Mike, > Are you sure this is jfs2? What does lsfs -q show you? There is no > "large file enablement" for jfs2 as all jfs2 filesystems are large file > enabled by default. Also with jfs2, the size of a file is limited to > the size of the filesystem. I believe jfs2 is 6TB. Also with jfs2 there > are no NBPI settings, only a block size (I doublechecked on my 5.1 and > 5.2 servers just to be sure). To me it sounds like you still have a jfs > filesystem set up, which explains the 64GB file limitation. > > ---Phil This is what I also found late last night. I rebuilt the filesystem and now everything is ok. Thanks for everyone's help! Mike |
| ||||
| This link is about the difference of JFS & JFS2 http://alangnet.ptez.org/myblog/inde...Id=31&blogId=1 Mike ´£¨ì: > On 2005-08-27, Phil Langerholc <root@localhost.nospam> wrote: > >>Mike wrote: >> >>>I've installed a samba share on an aix box for the dba >>>to test some backup stuff (doesn't have enough space >>>on the intel box). I created the file as a JFS2, large >>>file enabled, then also changed /etc/security/limits >>>setting fsize=-1 for that user. Restarted samb and things >>>look ok, however the file stops growing at 64GB. I know >>>that's a limitation number, but with all I had done (above) >>>I thought I was past this number. The file size is about >>>111 GB. >>> >>>Oh, creating the filesystem I maxed out NBPI and the next >>>setting (put both parameters to the highest value). >>> >>>Am I missing something or is the 64GB a real hard limit? >>> >>>Mike >> >>Hi Mike, >> Are you sure this is jfs2? What does lsfs -q show you? There is no >>"large file enablement" for jfs2 as all jfs2 filesystems are large file >>enabled by default. Also with jfs2, the size of a file is limited to >>the size of the filesystem. I believe jfs2 is 6TB. Also with jfs2 there >>are no NBPI settings, only a block size (I doublechecked on my 5.1 and >>5.2 servers just to be sure). To me it sounds like you still have a jfs >>filesystem set up, which explains the 64GB file limitation. >> >>---Phil > > > This is what I also found late last night. I rebuilt the filesystem > and now everything is ok. Thanks for everyone's help! > > Mike |