Unix Technical Forum

SEO

vBulletin Search Engine Optimization


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > AIX Operating System

Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2008, 10:30 AM
Joe D.
 
Posts: n/a
Default Strange mksysb behaviour following OS upgrade

OK; here's another one:

I've just upgraded my AIX server to 5200_08_CSP (thanks to Hajo and
all who replied to my cries for help!). Now I want to run a mksysb
after the upgrade. Simple enoughl I use the same command that serves me
well just this AM (and thanks to Frank and Hajo again for assistance
in troubleshooting THAT one!)

SO I run rhe command, and get some weird error messages about some
files in /usr/sbin havint too many levels of symbolic links:

# mksysb -m -e /dev/rmt0

Creating information file (/image.data) for rootvg..

Creating tape boot image..............
bosboot: Boot image is 27546 512 byte blocks.

***** ATTENTION *****
The boot image you just created might fail to boot because
the size exceeds the system limit. For information about
fixes or workarounds, see /usr/lpp/bos.sysmgt/README.
***** ATTENTION *****
....backup: 0511-449 An error occurred accessing ./usr/sbin/chiscsi/:
There are t
oo many levels of symbolic links to translate a path name.
backup: 0511-449 An error occurred accessing ./usr/sbin/lsiscsi/: There
are too
many levels of symbolic links to translate a path name.
backup: 0511-449 An error occurred accessing ./usr/sbin/mkiscsi/: There
are too
many levels of symbolic links to translate a path name.
backup: 0511-449 An error occurred accessing ./usr/sbin/rmiscsi/: There
are too
many levels of symbolic links to translate a path name.
..
0512-021 mksysb: Attempt to create a bootable tape failed:
mkinsttape /dev/rmt0.1 failed with return code 9.

Here are the files, and as you can see, they're just links to
themselves:

# ls -al |grep iscsi
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root system 17 Sep 22 20:21 chiscsi ->
/usr/sbin/chiscsi
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root system 17 Sep 22 20:21 lsiscsi ->
/usr/sbin/lsiscsi
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root system 17 Sep 22 20:21 mkiscsi ->
/usr/sbin/mkiscsi
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root system 17 Sep 22 20:21 rmiscsi ->
/usr/sbin/rmiscsi
#

I figure they're useless, just links to themselves, so I delete them;
can always recreate if they're needed, right?

# \rm *iscsi

# ls -al |grep iscsi
# ### They're no longer there


Re-run the command; same thing:

# mksysb -m -e /dev/rmt0

Creating information file (/image.data) for rootvg..

Creating tape boot image..............
bosboot: Boot image is 27546 512 byte blocks.

***** ATTENTION *****
The boot image you just created might fail to boot because
the size exceeds the system limit. For information about
fixes or workarounds, see /usr/lpp/bos.sysmgt/README.
***** ATTENTION *****
....backup: 0511-449 An error occurred accessing ./usr/sbin/chiscsi/:
There are t
oo many levels of symbolic links to translate a path name.
backup: 0511-449 An error occurred accessing ./usr/sbin/lsiscsi/: There
are too
many levels of symbolic links to translate a path name.
backup: 0511-449 An error occurred accessing ./usr/sbin/mkiscsi/: There
are too
many levels of symbolic links to translate a path name.
backup: 0511-449 An error occurred accessing ./usr/sbin/rmiscsi/: There
are too
many levels of symbolic links to translate a path name.
..
0512-021 mksysb: Attempt to create a bootable tape failed:
mkinsttape /dev/rmt0.1 failed with return code 9.

# date
Fri Sep 22 21:13:12 EDT 2006

# ls -al |grep iscsi
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root system 17 Sep 22 21:11 chiscsi ->
/usr/sbin/ch
iscsi
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root system 17 Sep 22 21:11 lsiscsi ->
/usr/sbin/ls
iscsi
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root system 17 Sep 22 21:11 mkiscsi ->
/usr/sbin/mk
iscsi
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root system 17 Sep 22 21:11 rmiscsi ->
/usr/sbin/rm
iscsi

The date and time stamp is the same as when I started the 2nd mksysb,
so it must be the mksysb that's creating these. What gives?

So I figure I'll just touch these files and see what happens:

# ls -al|grep iscsi
-rw-r--r-- 1 root system 0 Sep 22 21:22 chiscsi
-rw-r--r-- 1 root system 0 Sep 22 21:22 lsiscsi
-rw-r--r-- 1 root system 0 Sep 22 21:22 mkiscsi
-rw-r--r-- 1 root system 0 Sep 22 21:22 rmiscsi

rerun the mksysb, and the mksysb runs to completion. Any thoughts or
explanation?

Thanks;

Joe D.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2008, 10:30 AM
Hajo Ehlers
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Strange mksysb behaviour following OS upgrade

Joe D. wrote:
...
> 0512-021 mksysb: Attempt to create a bootable tape failed:
> mkinsttape /dev/rmt0.1 failed with return code 9.


You remember that i said: After the update its a good idea to use
fixcentral and the lslpp output to check for latest updates. Also
provide the next time an oslevel -r and oslevel -s

MKSYSB ON TAPE FAILS WITH ERROR 0512-021 RETURN CODE 9
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview...id=isg1IY88902

So get the fix and/or use fixcentral to check for other fixes aswell

On the way i found this page
AIX commands you should not leave home without
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerwork...utta_cmds.html

In your case you should be able to figure whats going on by:
1) mksysb is a script as many aix command. So adding a ' set -x ' is
pretty helpfull or run truss on it.

2) To find out in which package a program is located , a lpp source is
installed or not
$ which_fileset /usr/sbin/rmiscsi
$ lslpp -w /usr/sbin/rmiscsi
$ lspp -l PackageName
So you could added the missing package by yourself. It would be a
workaround since the mksysb should not create files if then not exist
imho.


3) Use the IBM website - its took me about 10 seconds to get to the
problem by searching for " 0512-021 mksysb chiscsi " and use the
advanced search option and setting it to: all of these words.


hth
Hajo

BTW: Please do not forget to delete these zero file you just created.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2008, 10:31 AM
Joe D.
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Strange mksysb behaviour following OS upgrade



Hajo Ehlers wrote:
> You remember that i said: After the update its a good idea to use
> fixcentral and the lslpp output to check for latest updates. Also
> provide the next time an oslevel -r and oslevel -s
>


Sorry; I did say that I upgraded to 5200-08-CSP, but next time I'll
include the commands and their output.
# oslevel -s
5200-08-CSP
# oslevel -r
5200-08
#

Also; I did remember your prior advice on the lslpp and another search
on Fix Central. I already ran it, and the results I got back were for 2
fixes, when I selected them for download, I got back verbiage that "All
of the selected fixes in your download list are currently installed on
your system or are included in the maintenance level installed on your
system."

I checked the server, and yes, the two fixes listed were indeed there:

# instfix -ik IY85504
All filesets for IY85504 were found.
# instfix -ik IY85930
All filesets for IY85930 were found.

I must still be confused on the mechanics of the Fix Central; I'm
currently AT the latest stable release, right? So if I want anything
newer, I need to now specify that I want to get the deltas between TL
5200-08 to TL 5200-09?

> MKSYSB ON TAPE FAILS WITH ERROR 0512-021 RETURN CODE 9
> http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview...id=isg1IY88902


I found this as well, before posting my question (I AM actually trying
to figure these things out as I go along). It applies to a fellow
upgrating to 5300-05. The fileset listed there is
devices.common.IBM.iscsi.rte 5.3.0.50. Now, I notice in the TL 5200-09
deltas, this file system is listed with a newer release than what I
have installed. Am I to assume I can download just that one and
install? WOuldn't that now put me at a 'mixed' maintenance mode (or
words to that effect)?

Regardless, after re-reading the link (was kind of tired when I
posted), I see now that there is a work-around of editing a file to
omit these entries. I think I'll take that route, and wait until I
update to the next TL to get the latest fix.
>
> So get the fix and/or use fixcentral to check for other fixes aswell
>


As mentioned above; I didn't find any that I didn't already have
installed without specifying that I now want to go to TL 5200-09, which
I don't (at least not now). Please let me know if I'm still missing
your point.

> On the way i found this page
> AIX commands you should not leave home without
> http://www-128.ibm.com/developerwork...utta_cmds.html
>
> In your case you should be able to figure whats going on by:
> 1) mksysb is a script as many aix command. So adding a ' set -x ' is
> pretty helpfull or run truss on it.
>


Good tip; I have debugged that way before; didn't think to in this
case.

> 2) To find out in which package a program is located , a lpp source is
> installed or not
> $ which_fileset /usr/sbin/rmiscsi
> $ lslpp -w /usr/sbin/rmiscsi


Neither command returned any results on my system.

>
> 3) Use the IBM website - its took me about 10 seconds to get to the
> problem by searching for " 0512-021 mksysb chiscsi " and use the
> advanced search option and setting it to: all of these words.
>


Yep; As mentioned, I found the same thing you did, but since it was for
5300-05, I discounted it.

Lastly, Hajo; a million thanks for your patience. I'm generally a
pretty helpful and patient guy myself, but I think that I would have
given up on me by now! : ) Your guidance and advice were flawless,
and I was able to construct the list of updates I needed and apply with
no pain at all. This server is in production as of tomorrow, and I had
no opportunity to run through it on a test system. So thanks again.

I'll look for your reply, but as far as this thread goes, I think I'm
all done. Sadly, one of the reasons I was upgrading in the first place
was to hopefully correct a JFS_META_CORRUPTION error that cropped up
intermittently. Well, its still happening, but that's for another post
(one you've replied to as well.)

CHeers!

Joe D.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2008, 10:31 AM
Hajo Ehlers
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Strange mksysb behaviour following OS upgrade

Joe D. wrote:
> Hajo Ehlers wrote:

....
> I must still be confused on the mechanics of the Fix Central; I'm
> currently AT the latest stable release, right? So if I want anything
> newer, I need to now specify that I want to get the deltas between TL
> 5200-08 to TL 5200-09?


Yes

>
> > MKSYSB ON TAPE FAILS WITH ERROR 0512-021 RETURN CODE 9
> > http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview...id=isg1IY88902


Dam, i posted for some unknown reason a wrong links.The correct links
is
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview...id=isg1IY89002

>
> I found this as well, before posting my question (I AM actually trying
> to figure these things out as I go along). It applies to a fellow
> upgrating to 5300-05.


Since IBM does currently provides support for AIX 5.3 and AIX 5.2
normaly a fix is supplied for both versions. So if you find a fix for
5.3 search for a fix for 5.2

> The fileset listed there is
> devices.common.IBM.iscsi.rte 5.3.0.50. Now, I notice in the TL 5200-09
> deltas, this file system is listed with a newer release than what I
> have installed. Am I to assume I can download just that one and
> install?


Short answer: Maybe

Long answer: You can go to fixcentral and select
- Specific fixes
-- search for: devices.common.IBM.iscsi.rte
, and name your current oslevel but even with selecting only - Include
requisites - you will get more then a gigabyte. In this case you should
stay with the current ML and try to solve the problem another way or
upgrade to the next TL

> WOuldn't that now put me at a 'mixed' maintenance mode (or
> words to that effect)?


Most of the time you will stay with a mixed ML.
Try
$ instfix -i # from memory.
Near the end of the line you will see a field :=: or :+: where = means
- fileset is at the current ML and a + means fileset is above the
level.

>
> Regardless, after re-reading the link (was kind of tired when I
> posted), I see now that there is a work-around of editing a file to
> omit these entries. I think I'll take that route, and wait until I
> update to the next TL to get the latest fix.


As long as you do not need iscsi its might be a good idea.

> > 2) To find out in which package a program is located , a lpp source is
> > installed or not
> > $ which_fileset /usr/sbin/rmiscsi
> > $ lslpp -w /usr/sbin/rmiscsi

>
> Neither command returned any results on my system.


The first cmd should tell you which package contains a command.
The second one list the package for a given command if it is installed.


>
> >
> > 3) Use the IBM website - its took me about 10 seconds to get to the
> > problem by searching for " 0512-021 mksysb chiscsi " and use the
> > advanced search option and setting it to: all of these words.
> >

>
> Yep; As mentioned, I found the same thing you did, but since it was for
> 5300-05, I discounted it.

Then you have been lazy because you got two answers ;-)

hth
Hajo

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
UnixAdminTalk.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908