Unix Technical Forum

Re: Anatomy of a bug

This is a discussion on Re: Anatomy of a bug within the mailing.openbsd.tech forums, part of the OpenBSD category; --> On Fri, 2004-09-10 at 19:40, Volker Kindermann wrote: > > so basically what you're saying is that we have ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > OpenBSD > mailing.openbsd.tech

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2008, 08:16 AM
Christian Gut
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Anatomy of a bug

On Fri, 2004-09-10 at 19:40, Volker Kindermann wrote:
> > so basically what you're saying is that we have some fuck who can't
> > code for shit - proven across two daemons you wrote - commiting code
> > both to the userland and kernel of an OS we all rely on for various
> > missions?

>
> so basically what you're saying is that you're using -current despite all

the warnings in production?

Well he made all the others lives easier using stable. If he used
stable, they would have probably not found that bug. So thanks for
testing and everything.

--
Christian Gut <cycloon@is-root.org>

[demime 0.98d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of signature.asc]

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com