This is a discussion on Re: Cisco VPN Client -> OpenBSD within the mailing.openbsd.tech forums, part of the OpenBSD category; --> Howdy, Avoid the use of XAUTH in your configuration. XAUTH is the non-standard which allows IPsec/IKE to authenticate with ...
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Howdy, Avoid the use of XAUTH in your configuration. XAUTH is the non-standard which allows IPsec/IKE to authenticate with a username (possibly involving a RADIUS DB lookup). This is probably the default in the Cisco client. I know of no opensource implementation of XAUTH. Even though it is not an IETF RFC, Cisco and Microsoft (and others) have implemented it from the dead IETF draft versions which the working group declined to recommend. Stick with standardized IPsec/IKE authentication methods and you should be able to get Cisco<->isakmpd to work. Password authentication is the simplest to configure and I recommend using it first as a proving ground even if you want to move onward from there to certificate based authentication. I have made isakmpd work with bunches of implementations and seen it work with bunches more. But (poor me) I cannot now recall if the Cisco client was specifically among them. In the future, IKEv2 promises to add the feature of being able to interact with username IPsec connections. Ricky Charlet > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Jacob [mailto:remon@ushustech.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 1:24 AM > To: tech@openbsd.org > Subject: Cisco VPN Client -> OpenBSD > > > Hi all! > > I was wondering whether VPN Client 4.0 can be used to connect > to OpenBSD. > > I tried doing it and got an "UNEQUAL_PAYLOAD_LENGTHS" error > message from the > OpenBSD box. > > Can the Cisco VPN Client be used as a generic IPsec VPN > client? It supports > IPsec...why not, eh? Has anybody had any success doing this? > If no, what's the > point of having standards like IPsec, I wonder!!! :-S > > I tried contacting Cisco for this information and they > REFUSED to answer !!! > It was just a query! > > Proprietary, Proprietary/ > Secrecy > So contrary/ > to OpenSource-ee/ > > :-( > > Any ideas? > > Regards, > Thomas Jacob > > ----------------------------------------------------------- Unless otherwise expressly stated, this message does not create or vary any contractual relationship between you and ARC International. The contents of this e-mail may be confidential and if you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, destroy any hard copies and telephone the above number. Incoming emails to ARC may be subject to monitoring other than by the addressee. |