This is a discussion on Re: /etc/rc doesn't create pflog0 unless pflogd is used within the mailing.openbsd.tech forums, part of the OpenBSD category; --> On 2008/01/16 16:48, Henning Brauer wrote: > * Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org> [2008-01-16 15:52]: > > On 2008/01/16 15:25, Henning ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| On 2008/01/16 16:48, Henning Brauer wrote: > * Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org> [2008-01-16 15:52]: > > On 2008/01/16 15:25, Henning Brauer wrote: > > > * Stefan Sperling <stsp@stsp.name> [2008-01-16 15:17]: > > > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 01:07:06AM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > > > If pflogd is disabled, pflog0 doesn't get created, so this happens: > > > > > > > > I noticed this also. I don't run pflogd on my soekris since I don't > > > > want pflogd to write to /var/log which is on CF disk. > > > > > > > > But sometimes I have to take a look at the pf logs in real time > > > > and having to create pflog0 manually is a bit of a nuisance after > > > > a while. I worked around this by putting "up" into /etc/hostname.pflog0 > > > > agreed, I actually noticed that long before spamlogd. > > > > > I wonder wether spamlogd should create the pflog interface it is trying > > > to use when started and it doesn't exist. > > > > that would definitely make sense for -l. > > and not for default pflog0? that logic i cannot follow let me change my wording: that would definitely make it easier to use -l. (I didn't mean to imply 'only do this for devices used by -l'). |