SEO
vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
02-18-2008, 09:20 AM
| ||||
| ||||
 Re: Fix for est/powernow 2 states bug On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 11:43:12AM -0700, Ted Unangst wrote: > On 4/20/07, Ted Unangst <ted.unangst@gmail.com> wrote: > >On 4/20/07, Gordon Willem Klok <gklok@cogeco.ca> wrote: > >totally. that is how setperf is supposed to work. i'm happy to see > >you're not changing any files i wrote  > although, looking closer, it looks like i am the one responsbile for > the naughty lines of code. mea culpa. heh well all the people including me who parrotted it elsewhere deserve most of the blame... > why the difference in computing i in est.c? why not use the same form > as powernow (i was especially confused by the new use of "low")? then > just switch i after. The difference is that est stores the p_states "backwards" from higest to lowest, where powernow stores them from lowest to highest, it was a little clunky for this first diff I will try and clean the logic up a bit.      |
Linear Mode
