On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 09:01:09AM -0200, Pedro Martelletto wrote:
> There is no need to set IN_CHANGE or IN_UPDATE at that point as no
> on-disk data is touched.
>
> Testing appreciated.

Anyone running with this?

-p.

Index: ufs/ufs/ufs_lookup.c
================================================== =================
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_lookup.c,v
retrieving revision 1.35
diff -u -p -r1.35 ufs_lookup.c
--- ufs/ufs/ufs_lookup.c 28 Dec 2005 20:48:18 -0000 1.35
+++ ufs/ufs/ufs_lookup.c 13 Nov 2006 12:28:55 -0000
@@ -414,7 +414,6 @@ notfound:
enduseful = slotoffset + slotsize;
}
dp->i_endoff = roundup(enduseful, DIRBLKSIZ);
- dp->i_flag |= IN_CHANGE | IN_UPDATE;
/*
* We return with the directory locked, so that
* the parameters we set up above will still be