SEO
vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
02-18-2008, 09:32 AM
| ||||
| ||||
 Re: greylisting bogus helo hmm, on Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:56:58PM -0700, Marco S Hyman said that > > > I trap numeric domains (an address litteral would contain brackets, > > > i.e. [1.2.3.4], so are allowed), non domain literals (got to have at > > > least one . in the name), domains that don't have an A or MX record, > > > > you wouldn't want to do this. sure, in a happy, nice world this would > > be ok, but there's just too many legitimate servers sending out bogus > > helo's. if your clients do business with small companies (like we do) > > It is not my job to educate clueless admins. If their server is > mis-configured it is not, by my definition, a legitimate server. > If they want to contact this site by email they will have to > either fix their configuration, use a different server, or print > out their message and send it via postal mail. Or give up. I > don't much care which they do. i am non compromising on my box, but can't be with clients. it's my job to help them, not punish them because of clueless admins around the world. > In practice this has not been a problem. Small companies without > knowledgable admins tend to use their ISP mail server. Of course, and the ISP's servers are misconfigured, sure. SMTP is the most often violated protocol in my opinion. sometimes blindly following RFC's when half of the world isn't becomes counterproductive. anyway, just my 2 czech crowns. -f -- perfection is the road, not the destination.      |
 |
« Re: greylisting bogus helo
|
Re: Cannot boot OpenBSD on landisk PX-EH from Seagate ST68022CF HDD »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:32 AM.
