SEO
vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
02-18-2008, 09:33 AM
| ||||
| ||||
 Re: licence on openbsd website On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:26:21 +0200, Christoph Egger wrote: >Hi! > >I don't know if this is the correct list for this topic and I don't intent >to start a (flame-)war. > >I just want to note, the license on the website [1] is different from >what is in the source [2]. Actually the difference is one clause. >Either the website or the source needs an update. >FYI, Lawyers actually look at the website, not into the source. > >[1] http://www.openbsd.org/policy.html >[2] src/sys/arch/i386/pci/pci_addr_fixup.c > Did you read the paragraph in [1] which says: "Berkeley rescinded the 3rd term (the advertising term) on 22 July 1999. Verbatim copies of the Berkeley license in the OpenBSD tree have that term removed. In addition, many 3rd-party BSD-style licenses consist solely of the first two terms." I take it that the third term is the one you refer to. More coffee neeeded? From the land "down under": Australia. Do we look <umop apisdn> from up over?      |
 |
« ldattach(8), a better utility to attach line disciplines to a tty
|
Re: ldattach(8), a better utility to attach line disciplines to a tty »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:41 PM.
