This is a discussion on Re: Making Apache use kqueue within the mailing.openbsd.tech forums, part of the OpenBSD category; --> We experimented with kqueue on OpenBSD 3.2 for a UDP protocol and found that performance was worse then select. ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| We experimented with kqueue on OpenBSD 3.2 for a UDP protocol and found that performance was worse then select. You will need to benchmark to be sure that kqueue gives you an improvement. Barry -----Original Message----- From: Pedro Martelletto [mailto Sent: 08 October 2003 00:53 To: tech@openbsd.org Subject: Making Apache use kqueue Hi, In an effort to make Apache use the kqueue mechanism, I've started to write an ap_select() replacement which uses kqueue. You can download it at http://pedro.sna.cx/kqueue.c. To which extent such a change would affect Apache's performance, I currently do not know - That's why I'm making this post. If at all possible, I would like people to comment, test, speak. Feedback will be very much appreciated. -p. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|