Re: more re: nfs openbsd setattr bug
This is a discussion on Re: more re: nfs openbsd setattr bug within the mailing.openbsd.tech forums, part of the OpenBSD category; --> On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, rick@snowhite.cis.uoguelph.ca wrote: > > I can confirm your diff fixes things for me. I'm ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
02-18-2008, 08:28 AM
| ||||
| ||||
 Re: more re: nfs openbsd setattr bug On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, rick@snowhite.cis.uoguelph.ca wrote: > > I can confirm your diff fixes things for me. I'm woried about one > > thing though: what if the client does atime TOSERVER mtime TOCLIENT? > > That should not be allowed. > > > > So here's a revised diff that catches that. > > Yep, I'd agree. It seems absurd that a client would do this, but I suppose > the server should be paranoid and protect against it. Your diff looks fine > to me. It's still not covering all cases: atime TOCLIENT mtime TOSERVER is allowed, while it should not. Will come up with a new diff tomorrow. But this is just fine-tuning, I'm glad we know what is going on now. Thanks, -Otto      |
 |
« Re: more re: nfs openbsd setattr bug
|
Suggestd replacement of ap_strtol with the native alternative strtol & strtoul == Patch attached == »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:17 AM.
