Re: ntpd logging

#1 (**permalink**) 02-18-2008, 07:28 AM

* Michael Shalayeff <mickey@lucifier.net> [2004-12-06 19:41]:
> Making, drinking tea and reading an opus magnum from Joerg Sonnenberger:
> > On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 10:56:58AM -0500, Michael Shalayeff wrote:
> > > > * Michael Shalayeff <mickey@lucifier.net> [2004-12-06 16:29]:
> > > > > re
> > > > > i do not think it makes much sense reporting time adjustments <1sec
> > > > > that only pollutes the log file and not really useful.
> >
> > Well, I would be a bit more conservative here. 1 sec is IMO quite a drift.
> > If I read the ntp.org's ntp_loopfilter.c correctly, it doesn't warn
> > for deltas smaller 0.128 sec, which seems more resonable.
> one second was just much easier to do (:
> it make sense for smaller values. here is a new diff

> + if (d >= LOG_NEGLIGEE * 1000)

well that would be / 1000

still not entirely happy even with that, but it is better than what we
have now I think

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode