Re: Patch: adding /usr/local/sbin to paths
This is a discussion on Re: Patch: adding /usr/local/sbin to paths within the mailing.openbsd.tech forums, part of the OpenBSD category; --> On 2/3/07, Gregory Hinton <zenbum@gmail.com> wrote: > The following patch fixes the problem of whereis(1) not finding > executables ...
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
02-18-2008, 09:10 AM
| ||||
| ||||
 Re: Patch: adding /usr/local/sbin to paths On 2/3/07, Gregory Hinton <zenbum@gmail.com> wrote: > The following patch fixes the problem of whereis(1) not finding > executables which have been installed in /usr/local/sbin. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the point that /usr/local/sbin should only be in the path if the user explicitly makes it so, so that shady programs are less troublesome or something? And isn't a better fix to define this in your .login when you're setting up your $PATH anyway? -Nick      |
Linear Mode
