vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Teemu Takanen wrote: > Now if we add call to this function with a small, probably configurable, > argument (typically 0-20) to pf_insert_state we keep up purging old > state entries while generating new ones. In cases with stable states > never expiring (and practically never coming up with new ones either), > nothing changes from the current way of doing things. At sites where the > connection creation rate is huge compared to the packet rate, the > PFTM_INTERVAL can be set in pf.conf to a large number and still the > purging done at insert_state can prevent the kernel running out of memory. Yeah, tying the garbage collection to allocation is what is being done successfully in many such systems. Cedric |