Unix Technical Forum

Re: small patch to etc/skel/dot.cshrc

This is a discussion on Re: small patch to etc/skel/dot.cshrc within the mailing.openbsd.tech forums, part of the OpenBSD category; --> On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 01:54:38 +0100 Marc Bevand <bevand_m@epita.fr> wrote: > I also think '.' should be remove ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > OpenBSD > mailing.openbsd.tech

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2008, 06:48 AM
Julian Leyh
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: small patch to etc/skel/dot.cshrc

On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 01:54:38 +0100
Marc Bevand <bevand_m@epita.fr> wrote:

> I also think '.' should be remove from the PATH. Example:
> - imagine an evil hacker places a binary (trojan...) called 'sl'
> in /tmp
> - if '.' is in the default PATH, the hacker would just have
> to wait long enough so that a user (whose cwd happens to be
> /tmp) mistypes 'sl' (instead of 'ls') so that it executes the
> trojan


ln -s /bin/ls /bin/sl

do that for the common type errors and your system is more secure

cu
JRL

--
visit my OpenBSD ports page: http://vgai.de/ports
--
If you don't remember something, it never existed...
If you aren't remembered, you never existed...

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com