This is a discussion on Re: strange results with pf within the mailing.openbsd.tech forums, part of the OpenBSD category; --> On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 04:30:16PM +0400, Alexei G. Malinin wrote: > as I mentioned above I removed ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 04:30:16PM +0400, Alexei G. Malinin wrote: > as I mentioned above I removed the rule "scrub in all" > I checked /var/log/pflog - there were no "protocol unreachable replies" :-( You should now have 'log' on all block rules. If pf is blocking the probes, you should see the probes (not the icmp replies) logged in /var/log/pflog. If you don't, the block rules are not effective (or logging is not properly set up). If you see the probes logged in /var/log/pflog, compare the matching rule number with pfctl -gvvsr output (the initial "@nr" part is the rule number). Does the rule blocking the probes really have 'return-icmp'? If so, pf may be attempting to send a reply, but fails due to lacking routing table entries. You're not running a bridge, are you? BTW, you can follow-up to pf@benzedrine.cx, I think we're cluttering tech@, not sure this is still on-topic here. Daniel |