vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Making, drinking tea and reading an opus magnum from Joerg Sonnenberger: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 09:44:26AM -0500, Michael Shalayeff wrote: > > compress and gzip are the same binary that supports > > addition of additional compression algorythms. > > bunzip2 part can be added most certainly but why? > > nothing in the system will ever use it anyway due to > > insane cpu and memory demands even for decompression. > > Because bzip2 offers better compression? Having decompression support > it base makes using bzip2 distfiles for ports much more sensible. > This saves bandwidth and more those with slow connection also time. > If you consider bzip2 slow, try 7zip. It does an even better job > at compressing data, but needs *much* more time. read the archives please. bzip* will never happen. cu -- paranoic mickey (my employers have changed but, the name has remained) |