Unix Technical Forum

UVM - why no user process submaps? [OpenBSD/TECH]

This is a discussion on UVM - why no user process submaps? [OpenBSD/TECH] within the mailing.openbsd.tech forums, part of the OpenBSD category; --> Hi, all I'm looking through the uvm code in 3.6, and ran across a puzzling comment - near uvm_map.c:2108 ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > OpenBSD > mailing.openbsd.tech

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2008, 07:44 AM
Jason W. Kim
 
Posts: n/a
Default UVM - why no user process submaps? [OpenBSD/TECH]

Hi, all

I'm looking through the uvm code in 3.6, and ran across a puzzling
comment -

near uvm_map.c:2108
/*
* uvm_map_submap: punch down part of a map into a submap
*
* => only the kernel_map is allowed to be submapped
* => the purpose of submapping is to break up the locking granularity
* of a larger map

My question is, why is the creation of submaps limited to only the
kernel? (Neither the tech archives nor cranor's thesis answers this
question so ...)

Secondly, what would it take to get the submap functionality working for
userland? Are there any specific "gotcha"'s that I need to be aware of
for getting the submap stuff working in userland?

Thanks,

-Jason Kim.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com