Unix Technical Forum

2.6 Kernel

This is a discussion on 2.6 Kernel within the Slackware Linux Support forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> I noticed that the slackware site mentioned that 9.1 is "2.6 Ready", does this mean that all I have ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > Slackware Linux Support

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2008, 05:21 PM
bards
 
Posts: n/a
Default 2.6 Kernel

I noticed that the slackware site mentioned that 9.1 is "2.6 Ready",
does this mean that all I have to do is download a 2.6 kernel (test7 is
the newest to date) and compile it ? Did I have to have chosen a
specific GCC (3.2.3 ?) to be able to use a 2.6 kernel ?


Cheers,


Bards.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2008, 05:21 PM
Richard Adams
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 2.6 Kernel

On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 21:47:21 +1000, bards wrote:

> I noticed that the slackware site mentioned that 9.1 is "2.6 Ready",
> does this mean that all I have to do is download a 2.6 kernel (test7 is
> the newest to date) and compile it ?


Thats it.

> Did I have to have chosen a specific GCC (3.2.3 ?) to be able to use a
> 2.6 kernel ?


No.

File to read for details on checking your system is;
/usr/src/linux-2.6.0testx/Documentaion/Changes

Most things in slack-9.1 have higher version numbers than is "needed".
So like it was stated, slack-9.1 is 2.6 ready.

>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Bards.


--
If the Linux community is a bunch of theives because they
try to imitate windows programs, then the Windows community
is built on organized crime.

Regards Richard
pa3gcu@zeelandnet.nl
http://people.zeelandnet.nl/pa3gcu/


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2008, 05:23 PM
bards
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 2.6 Kernel

Richard Adams wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 21:47:21 +1000, bards wrote:
>
>
>>I noticed that the slackware site mentioned that 9.1 is "2.6 Ready",
>>does this mean that all I have to do is download a 2.6 kernel (test7 is
>>the newest to date) and compile it ?

>
>
> Thats it.
>
>
>>Did I have to have chosen a specific GCC (3.2.3 ?) to be able to use a
>>2.6 kernel ?

>
>
> No.
>
> File to read for details on checking your system is;
> /usr/src/linux-2.6.0testx/Documentaion/Changes
>
> Most things in slack-9.1 have higher version numbers than is "needed".
> So like it was stated, slack-9.1 is 2.6 ready.
>
>
>>Cheers,
>>
>>
>>Bards.

>
>


Yes, thats all that it needed. Thanks for your help Richard.

I'll read the doco later, but I noticed that none of my modules loaded
automatically, I checked the rc scripts and it should run a depmod -a.

2.6 seems very responsive and I like the fact the I/O wait figure in
'top' is being used at last.


Cheers,


Bards.


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2008, 05:23 PM
Menno Duursma
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 2.6 Kernel

On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 07:38:12 +1000, bards wrote:

[snip]

> I'll read the doco later, but I noticed that none of my modules loaded
> automatically, I checked the rc scripts and it should run a depmod -a.


With the new version you should omit the `-a', "man depmod".

> 2.6 seems very responsive and I like the fact the I/O wait figure in
> 'top' is being used at last.


Interesting.

--
-Menno.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2008, 05:23 PM
James K
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 2.6 Kernel

On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 07:38:12 +1000, bards wrote:

> Yes, thats all that it needed. Thanks for your help Richard.
>
> I'll read the doco later, but I noticed that none of my modules loaded
> automatically, I checked the rc scripts and it should run a depmod -a.
>


I haven't made the leap yet, so this might not be completely accurate, but
I believe that you also need to upgrade your module-init-tools for
modprobe & depmod to work.

http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kern...rusty/modules/

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2008, 05:23 PM
bards
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 2.6 Kernel

James K wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 07:38:12 +1000, bards wrote:
>
>
>>Yes, thats all that it needed. Thanks for your help Richard.
>>
>>I'll read the doco later, but I noticed that none of my modules loaded
>>automatically, I checked the rc scripts and it should run a depmod -a.
>>

>
>
> I haven't made the leap yet, so this might not be completely accurate, but
> I believe that you also need to upgrade your module-init-tools for
> modprobe & depmod to work.
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kern...rusty/modules/
>


Thanks James, that looks like it might be what I need.



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2008, 05:24 PM
Richard Adams
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 2.6 Kernel

On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 16:11:36 -0700, James K wrote:

> On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 07:38:12 +1000, bards wrote:
>
>> Yes, thats all that it needed. Thanks for your help Richard.
>>
>> I'll read the doco later, but I noticed that none of my modules loaded
>> automatically, I checked the rc scripts and it should run a depmod -a.
>>

>
> I haven't made the leap yet, so this might not be completely accurate, but
> I believe that you also need to upgrade your module-init-tools for
> modprobe & depmod to work.


No you DONT need to upgarde mod-utils at all. Like Pat said, slack-9.1 is
2.6 ready.

> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kern...rusty/modules/


--
If the Linux community is a bunch of theives because they
try to imitate windows programs, then the Windows community
is built on organized crime.

Regards Richard
pa3gcu@zeelandnet.nl
http://people.zeelandnet.nl/pa3gcu/


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2008, 05:26 PM
m. sx
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 2.6 Kernel

On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 07:38:12 +1000
bards <bards1888@yahoo.com.au.au> wrote:

> I'll read the doco later, but I noticed that none of my modules loaded
> automatically, I checked the rc scripts and it should run a depmod -a.
>


Probably you need to generate the modprobe.conf file to load your modules.
(you can use /sbin/generate-modprobe.conf).
The file modules.conf is no longer used in 2.6.x. Anyone correct me if am wrong/

Greeting from Argentina

--
Marcelo



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2008, 05:26 PM
Wong Kum Weng
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 2.6 Kernel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Richard Adams wrote:
| On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 16:11:36 -0700, James K wrote:
|
|
|>On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 07:38:12 +1000, bards wrote:
|>
|>
|>>Yes, thats all that it needed. Thanks for your help Richard.
|>>
|>>I'll read the doco later, but I noticed that none of my modules loaded
|>>automatically, I checked the rc scripts and it should run a depmod -a.
|>>
|>
|>I haven't made the leap yet, so this might not be completely accurate, but
|>I believe that you also need to upgrade your module-init-tools for
|>modprobe & depmod to work.
|
|
| No you DONT need to upgarde mod-utils at all. Like Pat said, slack-9.1 is
| 2.6 ready.
|
|
|>http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kern...rusty/modules/
|
|

Hi, Can i just ask why after i compiled and reboot my system with the
new kernel, I always get a blank screen with nothing loading, sometimes
it even hang the system...

Thanks.

Regards,
Wong Kum Weng

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/i4Ao1bXyj+2X4JERAo+FAKCVuZco/vHtz8MEMnxFICUSXLGUyACcC0Qn
DBRpN+xtKxNwjWxc1gWamyA=
=gju+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2008, 05:27 PM
Jurgen Philippaerts
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 2.6 Kernel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 09:48:41PM PDT, Wong Kum Weng wrote
in article <3f8b7fbc$1@news.starhub.net.sg>:

> Hi, Can i just ask why after i compiled and reboot my system with the
> new kernel, I always get a blank screen with nothing loading, sometimes


verify your lilo.conf, it may be trying to set a screenmode that your
videocard does not support, or that your kernel does not support (eg,
you forget to select framebuffer)

you can always use "vga=normal"

> it even hang the system...


no it doesn't, you just don't see anything.


Jurgen.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/i40C1ucXIiwNwbURAvaDAJ4mmPWR9LlyOB3wP2dV1A61phV4tQ CcCLaK
AzOB6cANdt4/GXbe2Jcj+cs=
=PcKc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com