This is a discussion on the demise of linuxthreads within the Slackware Linux Support forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> Just looked on gnu site and noticed 2.4 was out, however this time there's no linuxthreads with it (latest ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Just looked on gnu site and noticed 2.4 was out, however this time there's no linuxthreads with it (latest is 2.3.6), so those wishing to upgrade are forced to stick with 2.3.6 or scrap linuxthreads. (Suppose you could always install 2.3.6 in /lib and 2.4 in /lib/tls, but that seems more hassle than its worth). Guess we'll either be seeing a move to 2.6 permanently, or slackware will hang behind on latest version of glibc for a while. Martin |
| |||
| Martin J. Green wrote : > Guess we'll either be seeing a move to 2.6 permanently, or slackware will > hang behind on latest version of glibc for a while. From the Slackware current Changelog: "a/glibc-solibs-2.3.6-i486-3.tgz: Recompiled against 2.4.32 and 2.6.15.6 kernel headers. Yes, I have seen that shiny-looking glibc-2.4 release on ftp.gnu.org, but glibc-2.4 completely drops support for linuxthreads, and therefore will not support vanilla Linux 2.4.x kernels. I don't think we're quite ready for that yet around here." -- Thomas O. This area is designed to become quite warm during normal operation. |
| ||||
| "Thomas Overgaard" <thover@post2.tele.dk> wrote in message news:5pmif3-fp4.ln1@news.inet.tele.dk... > From the Slackware current Changelog: > "a/glibc-solibs-2.3.6-i486-3.tgz: Recompiled against 2.4.32 and 2.6.15.6 > kernel headers. Yes, I have seen that shiny-looking glibc-2.4 release on > ftp.gnu.org, but glibc-2.4 completely drops support for linuxthreads, > and therefore will not support vanilla Linux 2.4.x kernels. I don't > think we're quite ready for that yet around here." Yep, never saw that in ChangeLog, but knew as much anyways. |