This is a discussion on Which file in which package defines ENOMEM? within the Slackware Linux Support forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> Hi all. I am having trouble compiling a package that includes libtool's ltdl library. Whenever I run make I ...
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Hi all. I am having trouble compiling a package that includes libtool's ltdl library. Whenever I run make I am getting the following error text: /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -g -O0 -c -o ltdl.lo ltdl.c gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -g -O0 -c ltdl.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/ltdl.o ltdl.c: In function `argzize_path': ltdl.c:2613: error: `ENOMEM' undeclared (first use in this function) ltdl.c:2613: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once ltdl.c:2613: error: for each function it appears in.) grep as I might, I cannot find a file that #defines ENOMEM. On a Debian Sid system I find it defined in /usr/include/asm-generic/errno-base.h That file does not exist on this Slackware 10.2 system which has been upgraded to the latest 10.2 packages. The odd thing is that I had successfully compiled this program a couple of months back so I'm not sure when things broke. Thanks! - Nate >> -- Wireless | Amateur Radio Station N0NB | Successfully Microsoft Amateur radio exams; ham radio; Linux info @ | free since January 1998. http://www.qsl.net/n0nb/ | "Debian, the choice of My Kawasaki KZ-650 SR @ | a GNU generation!" http://www.networksplus.net/n0nb/ | http://www.debian.org |
| |||
| Nate Bargmann wrote: > grep as I might, I cannot find a file that #defines ENOMEM. On a Debian > Sid > system I find it defined in /usr/include/asm-generic/errno-base.h That > file does not exist on this Slackware 10.2 system which has been upgraded > to the latest 10.2 packages. > > The odd thing is that I had successfully compiled this program a couple of > months back so I'm not sure when things broke. > > Thanks! > > - Nate >> > kernel-headers-2.4.33.2-i386-1:usr/include/asm-i386/errno.h -- Old Man |
| |||
| Old Man wrote: > > kernel-headers-2.4.33.2-i386-1:usr/include/asm-i386/errno.h > Okay, here is the content of that file: #ifndef _I386_ERRNO_H #define _I386_ERRNO_H #include <asm-generic/errno.h> #endif I'm missing the directory of /usr/include/asm-generic entirely. :-/ Also, I have kernel 2.4.31 installed. Did all this change with a new kernel version? Looking in /usr/src/linux/include/asm the errno.h seems to be the file I need as ENOMEM is #defined there. - Nate >> -- Wireless | Amateur Radio Station N0NB | Successfully Microsoft Amateur radio exams; ham radio; Linux info @ | free since January 1998. http://www.qsl.net/n0nb/ | "Debian, the choice of My Kawasaki KZ-650 SR @ | a GNU generation!" http://www.networksplus.net/n0nb/ | http://www.debian.org |
| |||
| Nate Bargmann <n0nb@networksplus.net> wrote: >Okay, here is the content of that file: > >#ifndef _I386_ERRNO_H >#define _I386_ERRNO_H > >#include <asm-generic/errno.h> > >#endif That's not correct. Try: ls -ld /usr/include/linux /usr/include/asm-i386 /usr/include/asm It should output something like this: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 8 Jan 30 2006 /usr/include/asm -> asm-i386 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Apr 4 2005 /usr/include/asm-i386 drwxr-xr-x 14 root root 12288 Jun 6 2005 /usr/include/linux asm-i386 and linux are directories and asm is a link to asm-i386 On the other hand, this would not be correct: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 Sep 22 14:39 /usr/include/asm -> /usr/src/linux/include/asm-i386 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 Sep 22 14:39 /usr/include/linux -> /usr/src/linux/include/linux where asm and linux are links to kernel source. If you have that then remove the links: rm /usr/include/asm /usr/include/linux and after that (or in any case) get the correct kernel-headers package (kernel-headers-2.4.31-i386-1.tgz) from the cdrom or from any slackware mirror site and reinstall it: upgradepkg --reinstall --install-new kernel-headers-2.4.31-i386-1.tgz |
| |||
| Nate Bargmann wrote: > Okay, here is the content of that file: > > #ifndef _I386_ERRNO_H > #define _I386_ERRNO_H > > #include <asm-generic/errno.h> > > #endif > Odd. On my system, /usr/include/asm-i386/errno.h looks like this: #ifndef _I386_ERRNO_H #define _I386_ERRNO_H #define EPERM 1 /* Operation not permitted */ #define ENOENT 2 /* No such file or directory */ #define ESRCH 3 /* No such process */ #define EINTR 4 /* Interrupted system call */ #define EIO 5 /* I/O error */ #define ENXIO 6 /* No such device or address */ #define E2BIG 7 /* Argument list too long */ #define ENOEXEC 8 /* Exec format error */ #define EBADF 9 /* Bad file number */ #define ECHILD 10 /* No child processes */ #define EAGAIN 11 /* Try again */ #define ENOMEM 12 /* Out of memory */ <snip many additional #defines> #define ENOMEDIUM 123 /* No medium found */ #define EMEDIUMTYPE 124 /* Wrong medium type */ #endif > I'm missing the directory of /usr/include/asm-generic entirely. :-/ As am I. I suspect that's not the problem. > Also, I have kernel 2.4.31 installed. Did all this change with a new > kernel > version? The in the original 10.2 kernel headers package for 2.4.31, /usr/include/asm-i386/errno.h is exactly the same as the one I show above. Mayber you need to reinstall the kernel headers package? > Looking in /usr/src/linux/include/asm the errno.h seems to be > the file I need as ENOMEM is #defined there. -- Old Man |
| |||
| I punted and reinstalled 10.2 after figuring that doing updates from a Slackware repository other than PV's probably wasn't a good thing. All is well now as I think a glibc update wiped everything out expecting a 2.6 kernel install to supply those files. I've got another partition to try 11.0 on when it becomes final. Thanks for the replies. - Nate >> -- Wireless | Amateur Radio Station N0NB | Successfully Microsoft Amateur radio exams; ham radio; Linux info @ | free since January 1998. http://www.qsl.net/n0nb/ | "Debian, the choice of My Kawasaki KZ-650 SR @ | a GNU generation!" http://www.networksplus.net/n0nb/ | http://www.debian.org |
| |||
| On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:02:43 -0500, Nate Bargmann <n0nb@networksplus.net> wrote: >I punted and reinstalled 10.2 after figuring that doing updates from a >Slackware repository other than PV's probably wasn't a good thing. At this stage of the game I'd have installed slack-current > All is >well now as I think a glibc update wiped everything out expecting a 2.6 >kernel install to supply those files. Stuff happened... > >I've got another partition to try 11.0 on when it becomes final. Try it now, report any problems to Pat V? I've done five boxen last week or two, nothing blew up an upgrade to -current from 10.2 done over several months, running 24/7 with very small downtime (minute or two each) due to reboots for new kernels. Grant. -- http://bugsplatter.mine.nu/ |
| |||
| Grant wrote: > Try it now, report any problems to Pat V? I've done five boxen last week > or two, nothing blew up > an upgrade to -current from 10.2 done over several months, running 24/7 > with very small downtime (minute or two each) due to reboots for new > kernels. What's a good way to do that without installing 10.2 first and trying to upgrade? - Nate >> -- Wireless | Amateur Radio Station N0NB | Successfully Microsoft Amateur radio exams; ham radio; Linux info @ | free since January 1998. http://www.qsl.net/n0nb/ | "Debian, the choice of My Kawasaki KZ-650 SR @ | a GNU generation!" http://www.networksplus.net/n0nb/ | http://www.debian.org |
| |||
| On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 19:05:24 -0500, Nate Bargmann <n0nb@networksplus.net> wrote: >Grant wrote: > >> Try it now, report any problems to Pat V? I've done five boxen last week >> or two, nothing blew up >> an upgrade to -current from 10.2 done over several months, running 24/7 >> with very small downtime (minute or two each) due to reboots for new >> kernels. > >What's a good way to do that without installing 10.2 first and trying to >upgrade? I'm not sure what you ask. What I do is create a boot CD from the -current mirror with: grant@deltree:/home/mirror$ cat make-boot-cd #!/bin/bash # # build a slackware boot cd, from isolinux/README.TXT # mkisofs -o /home/share/slackware.iso \ -R -J -V "Slackware Install" \ -x ./extra \ -x ./pasture \ -x ./source \ -x ./testing \ -x ./zipslack \ -x ./slackware/e \ -x ./slackware/gnome \ -x ./slackware/kde \ -x ./slackware/kdei \ -x ./slackware/t \ -x ./slackware/tcl \ -x ./slackware/xap \ -x ./slackware/x \ -x ./patches/source \ -hide-rr-moved \ -v -d -N -no-emul-boot -boot-load-size 4 -boot-info-table \ -sort isolinux/iso.sort \ -b isolinux/isolinux.bin \ -c isolinux/isolinux.boot \ -A "Slackware Install CD" . Called from say /home/mirror/slackware-current as ../make-boot-cd creates the ..iso image, burn that to CD then perform a network (NFS) install. You could burn a DVD with entire image with: grant@deltree:/home/mirror$ cat make-boot-dvd #!/bin/bash # # build a slackware boot cd, from isolinux/README.TXT # mkisofs -o /home/share/slackware-dvd.iso \ -R -J -V "Slackware 10.2 Install" \ -hide-rr-moved \ -v -d -N -no-emul-boot -boot-load-size 32 -boot-info-table \ -sort isolinux/iso.sort \ -b isolinux/isolinux.bin \ -c isolinux/isolinux.boot \ -A "Slackware Install DVD" . Otherwise you're stuck with trying to make a two or three CD set or downloading unofficial .iso files from out there on the 'net. Grant. -- http://bugsplatter.mine.nu/ |
| ||||
| On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 11:31:15 +1000, Grant wrote: > On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 19:05:24 -0500, Nate Bargmann <n0nb@networksplus.net> wrote: > >>Grant wrote: >> >>> Try it now, report any problems to Pat V? I've done five boxen last week >>> or two, nothing blew up >>> an upgrade to -current from 10.2 done over several months, running 24/7 >>> with very small downtime (minute or two each) due to reboots for new >>> kernels. >> >>What's a good way to do that without installing 10.2 first and trying to >>upgrade? > > I'm not sure what you ask. What I do is create a boot CD from the -current > mirror with: Thank you. Something like that is what I was looking for. I'll give it a try. - Nate >> -- "The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all possible worlds, the pessimist fears this is true." |